Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33093661›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2021

Innovations to culturing the uncultured microbial majority.

William H Lewis, Guillaume Tahon, Patricia Geesink, Diana Z Sousa, Thijs J G Ettema

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 304 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
304citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

304 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Biotechnological potential of marine invertebrate-associated bacteria with antibacterial activity against aquaculture and human pathogens.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

244 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William H LewisLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Guillaume TahonLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-4162
Patricia GeesinkLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6279-7770
Diana Z SousaLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3569-1545
Thijs J G EttemaLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. thijs.ettema@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6898-6377

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203276/K/16/ZWellcome Trust 203276/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the surge of microbial genome data, experimental testing is important to confirm inferences about the cell biology, ecological roles and evolution of microorganisms. As the majority of archaeal and bacterial diversity remains uncultured and poorly characterized, culturing is a priority. The growing interest in and need for efficient cultivation strategies has led to many rapid methodological and technological advances. In this Review, we discuss common barriers that can hamper the isolation and culturing of novel microorganisms and review emerging, innovative methods for targeted or high-throughput cultivation. We also highlight recent examples of successful cultivation of novel archaea and bacteria, and suggest key microorganisms for future cultivation attempts.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaBacteriological TechniquesCulture MediaCulture Media

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.