ArticleScientific reports2020
Tagging the proteasome active site β5 causes tag specific phenotypes in yeast.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acetic acid induces proteasome storage granule formation and inhibits proteasomal proteolysis: Comparison with other induction conditions.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Proteasome condensate formation is driven by multivalent interactions with shuttle factors and ubiquitin chains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Proteasome granule formation is regulated through mitochondrial respiration and kinase signaling.Journal of cell science · 2022Article
- Proteaphagy is specifically regulated and requires factors dispensable for general autophagy.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2022Article
- Proteasome activator Blm10 levels and autophagic degradation directly impact the proteasome landscape.The Journal of biological chemistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The efficient and timely degradation of proteins is crucial for many cellular processes and to maintain general proteostasis. The proteasome, a complex multisubunit protease, plays a critical role in protein degradation. Therefore, it is important to understand the assembly, regulation, and localization of proteasome complexes in the cell under different conditions. Fluorescent tags are often utilized to study proteasomes. A GFP-tag on the β5 subunit, one of the core particle (CP) subunits with catalytic activity, has been shown to be incorporated into proteasomes and commonly used by the field. We report here that a tag on this subunit results in aberrant phenotypes that are not observed when several other CP subunits are tagged. These phenotypes appear in combination with other proteasome mutations and include poor growth, and, more significantly, altered 26S proteasome localization. In strains defective for autophagy, β5-GFP tagged proteasomes, unlike other CP tags, localize to granules upon nitrogen starvation. These granules are reflective of previously described proteasome storage granules but display unique properties. This suggests proteasomes with a β5-GFP tag are specifically recognized and sequestered depending on physiological conditions. In all, our data indicate the intricacy of tagging proteasomes, and possibly, large complexes in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.