Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33093620›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2021

The evolution of coexistence from competition in experimental co-cultures of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Jake N Barber, Aysha L Sezmis, Laura C Woods, Trenton D Anderson, Jasmyn M Voss, Michael J McDonald

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The evolution of autonomy from two cooperative specialists in fluctuating environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Carbon starvation raises capacities in bacterial antibiotic resistance and viral auxiliary carbon metabolism in soils.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jake N Barber *School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Monash, VIC, Australia.
Aysha L Sezmis *School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Monash, VIC, Australia.
Laura C WoodsSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Monash, VIC, Australia.
Trenton D AndersonSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Monash, VIC, Australia.
Jasmyn M VossSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Monash, VIC, Australia.
Michael J McDonaldSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Monash, VIC, Australia. mike.mcdonald@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-960X
Monash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities are comprised of many species that coexist on small spatial scales. This is difficult to explain because many interspecies interactions are competitive, and ecological theory predicts that one species will drive the extinction of another species that competes for the same resource. Conversely, evolutionary theory proposes that natural selection can lead to coexistence by driving competing species to use non-overlapping resources. However, evolutionary escape from extinction may be slow compared to the rate of competitive exclusion. Here, we use experimental co-cultures of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae to study the evolution of coexistence in species that compete for resources. We find that while E. coli usually outcompetes S. cerevisiae in co-culture, a few populations evolved stable coexistence after ~1000 generations of coevolution. We sequenced S. cerevisiae and E. coli populations, identified multi-hit genes, and engineered alleles from these genes into several genetic backgrounds, finding that some mutations modified interactions between E. coli and S. cerevisiae. Together, our data demonstrate that coexistence can evolve, de novo, from intense competition between two species with no history of coevolution.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliSaccharomyces cerevisiaeBiological EvolutionCoculture TechniquesSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID33093620
PMCPMC8027373
OpenAlexW3094052059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.