ArticleScientific reports2020
Improving image quality in fast, time-resolved micro-CT by weighted back projection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time-resolved micro-CT is an increasingly powerful technique for studying dynamic processes in materials and structures. However, it is still difficult to study very fast processes with this technique, since fast scanning is typically associated with high image noise levels. We present weighted back projection, a technique applicable in iterative reconstruction methods using two types of prior knowledge: (1) a virtual starting volume resembling the sample, for example obtained from a scan before the dynamic process was initiated, and (2) knowledge on which regions in the sample are more likely to undergo the dynamic process. Therefore, processes on which this technique is applicable are preferably occurring within a static grid. Weighted back projection has the ability to handle small errors in the prior knowledge, while similar 4D micro-CT techniques require the prior knowledge to be exactly correct. It incorporates the prior knowledge within the reconstruction by using a weight volume, representing for each voxel its probability of undergoing the dynamic process. Qualitative analysis on a sparse subset of projection data from a real micro-CT experiment indicates that this method requires significantly fewer projection angles to converge to a correct volume. This can lead to an improved temporal resolution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.