ArticleScientific reports2020
Synthesis of computer simulation and machine learning for achieving the best material properties of filled rubber.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Review of Performance Prediction Based on Machine Learning in Materials Science.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Data-Driven Methods for Accelerating Polymer Design.ACS polymers Au · 2022Review
- Machine learning assisted optimization of blending process of polyphenylene sulfide with elastomer using high speed twin screw extruder.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Analysis on Microstructure-Property Linkages of Filled Rubber Using Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.Polymers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is used to analyze the mechanical properties of polymerized and nanoscale filled rubber. Unfortunately, the computation time for a simulation can require several months' computing power, because the interactions of thousands of filler particles must be calculated. To alleviate this problem, we introduce a surrogate convolutional neural network model to achieve faster and more accurate predictions. The major difficulty when employing machine-learning-based surrogate models is the shortage of training data, contributing to the huge simulation costs. To derive a highly accurate surrogate model using only a small amount of training data, we increase the number of training instances by dividing the large-scale simulation results into 3D images of middle-scale filler morphologies and corresponding regional stresses. The images include fringe regions to reflect the influence of the filler constituents outside the core regions. The resultant surrogate model provides higher prediction accuracy than that trained only by images of the entire region. Afterwards, we extract the fillers that dominate the mechanical properties using the surrogate model and we confirm their validity using MD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.