Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33093532›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Prediction of rifampicin resistance beyond the RRDR using structure-based machine learning approaches.

Stephanie Portelli, Yoochan Myung, Nicholas Furnham, Sundeep Chaitanya Vedithi, Douglas E V Pires, David B Ascher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predicting rifampicin resistance inERJ open research · 2025
    Article
  8. Comprehensive genome analysis ofVeterinary world · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Engineering G protein-coupled receptors for stabilization.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Prediction of pyrazinamide resistance inJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie PortelliDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3515-4301
Yoochan MyungDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6763-9808
Nicholas FurnhamDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Sundeep Chaitanya VedithiDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Douglas E V PiresComputational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, 3004, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3004-2119
David B AscherDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia. david.ascher@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2948-2413
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AUUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K020420/1Medical Research Council MR/M026302/1Medical Research Council MR/T000171/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rifampicin resistance is a major therapeutic challenge, particularly in tuberculosis, leprosy, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus infections, where it develops via missense mutations in gene rpoB. Previously we have highlighted that these mutations reduce protein affinities within the RNA polymerase complex, subsequently reducing nucleic acid affinity. Here, we have used these insights to develop a computational rifampicin resistance predictor capable of identifying resistant mutations even outside the well-defined rifampicin resistance determining region (RRDR), using clinical M. tuberculosis sequencing information. Our tool successfully identified up to 90.9% of M. tuberculosis rpoB variants correctly, with sensitivity of 92.2%, specificity of 83.6% and MCC of 0.69, outperforming the current gold-standard GeneXpert-MTB/RIF. We show our model can be translated to other clinically relevant organisms: M. leprae, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, despite weak sequence identity. Our method was implemented as an interactive tool, SUSPECT-RIF (StrUctural Susceptibility PrEdiCTion for RIFampicin), freely available at https://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/suspect_rif/ .

Indexed as

Machine LearningMutation, MissenseAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansLeprosyMycobacterium lepraeMycobacterium tuberculosisRifampinStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusTuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsRifampin

Identifiers

PMID33093532
PMCPMC7581776
OpenAlexW3093944744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.