ArticleScientific reports2020
3D reconstruction of coronary artery bifurcations from coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography: feasibility, validation, and reproducibility.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography Feature Extraction with Application to Three-Dimensional Reconstruction.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Pooled it
- Proximal optimisation technique versus final kissing balloon inflation in coronary bifurcation lesions: the randomised, multicentre PROPOT trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021Trial
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Diagnosis and Revascularization Guidance of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Contemporary Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Postdilation Strategies Following Provisional Stenting of Left Main Coronary Bifurcations: Insights From Patient-Specific Computational Simulations.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Precision percutaneous coronary intervention.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Review
- Patient-Specific 3D Coronary Reconstruction and Computational Simulations to Guide Drug-Coated Balloon Intervention: First-in-Human Experience.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- A comprehensive workflow for CCTA and OCT data fusion with 3D printing validation: advancing patient-specific testing environments for percutaneous coronary intervention devices.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Computational simulations of coronary artery bifurcation stenting using realistic plaque distribution and materials.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Interventions: Preprocedural Planning and Procedural Assistance.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Review
- Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography for guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: a review of current clinical applications.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2024Review
- Article
- Rapid automated lumen segmentation of coronary optical coherence tomography images followed by 3D reconstruction of coronary arteries.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- 3D reconstruction of coronary artery bifurcations from intravascular ultrasound and angiography.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Intravascular imaging of angioplasty balloon under-expansion during pre-dilation predicts hyperelastic behavior of coronary artery lesions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Framework for lumen-based nonrigid tomographic coregistration of intravascular images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022Article
- First-in-Human Computational Preprocedural Planning of Left Main Interventions Using a New Everolimus-Eluting Stent.JACC. Case reports · 2022Article
- Stacked 1/3 Tubular Plates for Fixation of Pediatric Forearm Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.Kansas journal of medicine · 2022Article
- Patient-specific computational simulation of coronary artery bifurcation stenting.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Three dimensional reconstruction of coronary artery stents from optical coherence tomography: experimental validation and clinical feasibility.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Computational and experimental mechanical performance of a new everolimus-eluting stent purpose-built for left main interventions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The three-dimensional (3D) representation of the bifurcation anatomy and disease burden is essential for better understanding of the anatomical complexity of bifurcation disease and planning of stenting strategies. We propose a novel methodology for 3D reconstruction of coronary artery bifurcations based on the integration of angiography, which provides the backbone of the bifurcation, with optical coherence tomography (OCT), which provides the vessel shape. Our methodology introduces several technical novelties to tackle the OCT frame misalignment, correct positioning of the OCT frames at the carina, lumen surface reconstruction, and merging of bifurcation lumens. The accuracy and reproducibility of the methodology were tested in n = 5 patient-specific silicone bifurcations compared to contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography (µCT), which was used as reference. The feasibility and time-efficiency of the method were explored in n = 7 diseased patient bifurcations of varying anatomical complexity. The OCT-based reconstructed bifurcation models were found to have remarkably high agreement compared to the µCT reference models, yielding r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.