Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33093487›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Ensemble transfer learning for the prediction of anti-cancer drug response.

Yitan Zhu, Thomas Brettin, Yvonne A Evrard, Alexander Partin, Fangfang Xia, Maulik Shukla, Hyunseung Yoo, James H Doroshow, Rick L Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yitan ZhuComputing, Environment and Life Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, USA. yitan.zhu@anl.gov.
Thomas BrettinComputing, Environment and Life Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, USA.
Yvonne A EvrardFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Alexander PartinComputing, Environment and Life Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, USA.
Fangfang XiaComputing, Environment and Life Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, USA.
Maulik ShuklaComputing, Environment and Life Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, USA.
Hyunseung YooComputing, Environment and Life Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, USA.
James H DoroshowDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Rick L StevensComputing, Environment and Life Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, USA.

Funding

CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transfer learning, which transfers patterns learned on a source dataset to a related target dataset for constructing prediction models, has been shown effective in many applications. In this paper, we investigate whether transfer learning can be used to improve the performance of anti-cancer drug response prediction models. Previous transfer learning studies for drug response prediction focused on building models to predict the response of tumor cells to a specific drug treatment. We target the more challenging task of building general prediction models that can make predictions for both new tumor cells and new drugs. Uniquely, we investigate the power of transfer learning for three drug response prediction applications including drug repurposing, precision oncology, and new drug development, through different data partition schemes in cross-validation. We extend the classic transfer learning framework through ensemble and demonstrate its general utility with three representative prediction algorithms including a gradient boosting model and two deep neural networks. The ensemble transfer learning framework is tested on benchmark in vitro drug screening datasets. The results demonstrate that our framework broadly improves the prediction performance in all three drug response prediction applications with all three prediction algorithms.

Indexed as

Datasets as TopicDeep LearningDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug DevelopmentDrug RepositioningHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID33093487
PMCPMC7581765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.