Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33093485›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses of chemosensory genes in the citrus fruit fly Bactrocera (Tetradacus) minax.

Jun-Feng Cheng, Ting Yu, Zhong-Jian Chen, Shicheng Chen, Yu-Peng Chen, Lei Gao, Wen-Hu Zhang, Bo Jiang, Xue Bai, Edward D Walker and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jun-Feng ChengCollege of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ting YuAgro-Biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhong-Jian ChenAgro-Biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shicheng ChenDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Yu-Peng ChenCollege of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lei GaoCrop Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Improvement, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wen-Hu ZhangAgro-Biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Bo JiangFruit Tree Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xue BaiCollege of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Edward D WalkerDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Jun LiuAgro-Biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. liujun@gdaas.cn.
Yong-Yue LuCollege of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. luyongyue@scau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The citrus fruit fly Bactrocera (Tetradacus) minax is a major and devastating agricultural pest in Asian subtropical countries. Previous studies have shown that B. minax interacts with plant hosts via the efficient chemosensory system. However, the molecular components of the B. minax chemosensory system have not been well characterized. Herein, we identified a total of 25 putative odorant-binding receptors (OBPs), 4 single-copy chemosensory proteins (CSPs) and 53 candidate odorant receptors (ORs) using a newly generated whole-genome dataset for B. minax. This study significantly extended the chemosensation-related gene profiles (particularly, OBPs and ORs) in six other tephritid species. Comparative transcriptome analysis of adult B. minax and Bactrocera dorsalis showed that there were 14 highly expressed OBPs (FPKM > 100) in B. dorsalis and 7 highly expressed ones in B. minax. The expression level of CSP3 gene and CSP4 gene was higher in B. dorsalis than that in B. minax. Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses of chemosensory genes in the citrus fruit fly B. minax provided new insights for preventive control of this agriculture important pest and closely related species.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsCitrusGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsInsect ProteinsPhylogenyReceptors, OdorantTephritidaeInsect ProteinsReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID33093485
PMCPMC7583261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.