Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33093189›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2021

Quantile regression of tobacco tax pass-through in the UK 2013-2019. How have manufacturers passed through tax changes for different tobacco products?

Luke Brian Wilson, Robert Pryce, Rosemary Hiscock, Colin Angus, Alan Brennan, Duncan Gillespie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Widening the Price Gap: The Effect of The Netherlands' 2020 Tax Increase on Tobacco Prices.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Tax Incidence and Tax Pass-Through of Smokeless Tobacco in the US.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luke Brian WilsonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK l.b.wilson@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5769-5729
Robert PryceSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Rosemary HiscockTobacco Control Research Group, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9741-9083
Colin AngusSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Alan BrennanSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Duncan GillespieSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 16/105/26Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of tax increases relies heavily on the tobacco industry passing on such increases to smokers (also referred to as 'pass-through'). Previous research has found heterogeneous levels of tax pass-through across the market segments of tobacco products available to smokers. This study uses retail sales data to assess the extent to which recent tax changes have been passed on to smokers and whether this varies across the price distribution.

methodsWe use panel data quantile regression analysis on Nielsen commercial data of tobacco price and sales in the UK from January 2013 to March 2019 combined with official UK tax rates and inflation to calculate the rate of tax pass-through for factory made (FM) cigarettes and roll your own (RYO) tobacco.

resultsFollowing increases in the specific tax payable on tobacco, we find evidence of overshifting across the price distribution for both FM and RYO. The rate of the overshift in tax increased the more expensive the products were. This was consistent for FM and RYO. Additionally, our findings suggest that the introduction of standardised packaging was not followed by changes in how the tobacco industry responded to tax increases.

conclusionsFollowing the repeated introduction of increases in specific tobacco tax as well as standardised packaging, we show that the tobacco industry applies techniques to keep the cheapest tobacco cheaper relative to the more expensive products when passing on tax increases to smokers.

Indexed as

Tobacco IndustryTobacco ProductsCommerceHumansTaxesUnited Kingdomeconomicstaxationtobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID33093189
PMCPMC8606450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.