Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33093164›Full record

ArticleThorax2021

Introduction of standardised packaging and availability of illicit cigarettes: a difference-in-difference analysis of European Union survey data 2015-2018.

Anthony A Laverty, Christopher Millett, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Filippos T Filippidis

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Thorax, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anthony A LavertyPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK a.laverty@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1318-8439
Christopher MillettPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas S HopkinsonNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3235-0454
Filippos T FilippidisPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2101-2559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standardised packaging of tobacco products is intended to reduce the appeal of smoking, but the tobacco industry claims this increases illicit trade. We examined the percentage of people reporting being offered illicit cigarettes before and after full implementation of standardised packaging in the UK, Ireland and France and compared this to other European Union countries. Reported ever illicit cigarette exposure fell from 19.8% to 18.1% between 2015 and 2018 in the three countries fully implementing the policy, and from 19.6% to 17.0% in control countries (p for difference=0.320). Standardised packaging does not appear to increase the availability of illicit cigarettes.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolEuropeEuropean UnionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedProduct PackagingRetrospective StudiesSmokingtobacco control

Identifiers

PMID33093164
PMCPMC7803897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.