Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33092734›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2020

Proteomic Signatures of Heart Failure in Relation to Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Luigi Adamo, Jinsheng Yu, Cibele Rocha-Resende, Ali Javaheri, Richard D Head, Douglas L Mann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Decoding the Heart Failure Peptidome.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luigi AdamoCenter for Cardiovascular Research, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/WashUCards.
Jinsheng YuDepartment of Genetics, McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Cibele Rocha-ResendeCenter for Cardiovascular Research, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Ali JavaheriCenter for Cardiovascular Research, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/Alicardsdoc.
Richard D HeadDepartment of Genetics, McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Douglas L MannCenter for Cardiovascular Research, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: dmann@wustl.edu.
James S. McDonnell Foundation · USTwitter (United States) · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
SALsalate to Improve Exercise toleraNce and LVDD in T2dm-DHF (SALIENT-DHF trial)U10HL110309 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVILA-ROMAN, VICTOR G., MANN, DOUGLAS L · 2012 to 2018
$3.5M
CTRIP: Genetic Testing to Individualize Management of Common Heart DiseasesRC2HL102222 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DORN, GERALD W. · 2009 to 2010
$1.9M
Phenotype, dynamics and activation of myocardial B lymphocytes in response toischemia/reperfusion injuryK08HL145108 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ADAMO, LUIGI · 2019 to 2023
$753k
HARNESSING THE LYSOSOME MACHINERY IN MACROPHAGES TO PREVENT HEART FAILUREK08HL138262 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JAVAHERI, ALI · 2017 to 2021
$752k
Autophagy in Myocardial Recovery and RemissionI01BX005065 · VA · ST. LOUIS VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DIWAN, ABHINAV · 2020 to 2023
–
BLRD VA I01 BX005065NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL138262NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL145108NHLBI NIH HHS RC2 HL102222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing recognition of the inherent limitations of the use of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to accurately phenotype patients with heart failure (HF).

objectivesThe authors sought to identify unique proteomic signatures for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with a midrange LVEF (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), as well as to identify molecular differences between patients with ischemic and nonischemic HF.

methodsWe used high-content aptamer-based proteomics technology (SOMAscan) to interrogate the blood proteome of age- and sex-matched patients with HF within different LVEF groups.

resultsWithin the Washington University Heart Failure Registry, we identified age/sex-matched patients within 3 LVEF categories: HFrEF (LVEF <40%), HFmrEF (LVEF 40% to 50%), and HFpEF (LVEF >50%). We found that patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF had unique variations in circulating proteins that reflected distinct biological pathophysiologies. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that there were biological themes that were unique to patients with HFrEF, HFpEF, or HFmrEF. Comparative analyses of patients with HFmrEF with improved LVEF and patients with HFmrEF with unchanged LVEF revealed marked differences between these 2 patient populations and indicated that patients with recovered LVEF are more similar to patients with HFpEF than to patients with HFrEF. Moreover, there were marked differences in the proteomic signatures of patients with ischemic and nonischemic HF.

conclusionsViewed together, these findings suggest that it may be possible to use high-content multiplexed proteomics assays in combination with the clinical assessment of LVEF to more accurately identify clinical phenotypes of patients with HF.

Indexed as

ProteomicsStroke VolumeBlood ProteinsFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMatched-Pair AnalysisMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaRegistriesSignal TransductionWnt Signaling PathwayBlood Proteinsheart failureleft ventricular ejection fractionproteomics

Identifiers

PMID33092734
PMCPMC7584807
OpenAlexW3094110191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.