ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2020
Proteomic Signatures of Heart Failure in Relation to Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.
Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomics for heart failure risk stratification: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Development and Validation of a Protein Risk Score for Mortality in Heart Failure : A Community Cohort Study.Annals of internal medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Therapeutic Targets for Heart Failure Identified Using Proteomics and Mendelian Randomization.Circulation · 2022Pooled it
- Proteomic pathways across the ejection fraction spectrum in patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus: an EXSCEL trial substudy.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Urinary Proteomics and Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Trial
- Proteomic Analysis of Effects of Spironolactone in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Circulation. Heart failure · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential Proteomic Risk Score for Predicting Clinical Outcome in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Article
- The plasma protein profile of left ventricular diastolic function.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- CompBio and MIRaS-a multi-omic analysis platform built on a memory-based intelligence engine.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Circulating Proteomic Profiles in Ambulatory Patients With Advanced Stage C2D Heart Failure: Insights From the Registry Evaluation of Vital Information for VADs in Ambulatory Life (REVIVAL) Registry.Journal of cardiac failure · 2026Article
- Aptamer-based proteomics in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms and Multi-Omics Integration in Heart Failure: From Pathophysiology to Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Novel biomarkers distinguish heart failure with preserved vs reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2026Observational
- Decoding the Heart Failure Peptidome.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Article
- Review
- Addressing Unmet Needs in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Multi-Omics Approaches to Therapeutic Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Call for a Precision Medicine Approach.JACC. Advances · 2026Review
- Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Advances in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Cardioimmunologic response patterns after an acute heart failure event: Design and first results of AHF-ImmunoCS.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a growing recognition of the inherent limitations of the use of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to accurately phenotype patients with heart failure (HF).
objectivesThe authors sought to identify unique proteomic signatures for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with a midrange LVEF (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), as well as to identify molecular differences between patients with ischemic and nonischemic HF.
methodsWe used high-content aptamer-based proteomics technology (SOMAscan) to interrogate the blood proteome of age- and sex-matched patients with HF within different LVEF groups.
resultsWithin the Washington University Heart Failure Registry, we identified age/sex-matched patients within 3 LVEF categories: HFrEF (LVEF <40%), HFmrEF (LVEF 40% to 50%), and HFpEF (LVEF >50%). We found that patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF had unique variations in circulating proteins that reflected distinct biological pathophysiologies. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that there were biological themes that were unique to patients with HFrEF, HFpEF, or HFmrEF. Comparative analyses of patients with HFmrEF with improved LVEF and patients with HFmrEF with unchanged LVEF revealed marked differences between these 2 patient populations and indicated that patients with recovered LVEF are more similar to patients with HFpEF than to patients with HFrEF. Moreover, there were marked differences in the proteomic signatures of patients with ischemic and nonischemic HF.
conclusionsViewed together, these findings suggest that it may be possible to use high-content multiplexed proteomics assays in combination with the clinical assessment of LVEF to more accurately identify clinical phenotypes of patients with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.