Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33092732›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2020

Prognostic Utility of Right Ventricular Remodeling Over Conventional Risk Stratification in Patients With COVID-19.

Jiwon Kim, Alexander Volodarskiy, Razia Sultana, Meridith P Pollie, Brian Yum, Lakshmi Nambiar, Romina Tafreshi, Hannah W Mitlak, Arindam RoyChoudhury, Evelyn M Horn and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Echocardiographic assessment of the right ventricle in COVID-19: a systematic review.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cardiovascular Manifestations of Patients with Long COVID.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiwon KimDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. Electronic address: jik9027@med.cornell.edu.
Alexander VolodarskiyNew York Presbyterian Hospital-Queens, Queens, New York.
Razia SultanaDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Meridith P PollieDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Brian YumDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Lakshmi NambiarDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Romina TafreshiDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Hannah W MitlakDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Arindam RoyChoudhuryDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Evelyn M HornDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Ingrid HriljacDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Nupoor NarulaDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Sijun KimNew York Presbyterian Hospital-Queens, Queens, New York.
Lishomwa NdhlovuInfectious Disease, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Parag GoyalDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Monika M SaffordGeneral Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Leslee ShawDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Richard B DevereuxDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Jonathan W WeinsaftDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Cornell University · USNew York Hospital Queens · US

Funding

CMR Myocardial Tissue Based Prediction of Ischemic MR Revascularization ResponseR01HL128278 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI WEINSAFT, JONATHAN W. · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
Advanced CMR Tissue-Based Prediction of Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Revascularization ResponseK23HL140092 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI KIM, JIWON · 2018 to 2022
$847k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL140092NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a growing pandemic that confers augmented risk for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and dilation; the prognostic utility of adverse RV remodeling in COVID-19 patients is uncertain.

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to test whether adverse RV remodeling (dysfunction/dilation) predicts COVID-19 prognosis independent of clinical and biomarker risk stratification.

methodsConsecutive COVID-19 inpatients undergoing clinical transthoracic echocardiography at 3 New York City hospitals were studied; images were analyzed by a central core laboratory blinded to clinical and biomarker data.

resultsIn total, 510 patients (age 64 ± 14 years, 66% men) were studied; RV dilation and dysfunction were present in 35% and 15%, respectively. RV dysfunction increased stepwise in relation to RV chamber size (p = 0.007). During inpatient follow-up (median 20 days), 77% of patients had a study-related endpoint (death 32%, discharge 45%). RV dysfunction (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49 to 4.43; p = 0.001) and dilation (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.96; p = 0.02) each independently conferred mortality risk. Patients without adverse RV remodeling were more likely to survive to hospital discharge (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.90; p = 0.041). RV indices provided additional risk stratification beyond biomarker strata; risk for death was greatest among patients with adverse RV remodeling and positive biomarkers and was lesser among patients with isolated biomarker elevations (p ≤ 0.001). In multivariate analysis, adverse RV remodeling conferred a >2-fold increase in mortality risk, which remained significant (p < 0.01) when controlling for age and biomarker elevations; the predictive value of adverse RV remodeling was similar irrespective of whether analyses were performed using troponin, D-dimer, or ferritin.

conclusionsAdverse RV remodeling predicts mortality in COVID-19 independent of standard clinical and biomarker-based assessment.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyVentricular RemodelingAgedAged, 80 and overBetacoronavirusBiomarkersCohort StudiesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHeartHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityPandemicsBiomarkersCOVID-19 (coronavirus)echocardiographyright ventricle

Identifiers

PMID33092732
PMCPMC7572068
OpenAlexW3092759951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.