ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2020
Diagnostic value of
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Cancers · 2026Article
- Clinical PET/MR.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026Review
- Review
- Contrast-enhanced MRI and CT in evaluating treatment response for recurrent endometrial cancer: a retrospective case-control study.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Review
- Application of PET/MRI in Gynecologic Malignancies.Cancers · 2024Review
- Additional Value of FDG-PET/MRI Complementary to Sentinel Lymphonodectomy for Minimal Invasive Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Prospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Retrospective analysis of theRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
- 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Management of Gynecological Malignancies: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.Journal of imaging · 2023Review
- Current Update on PET/MRI in Gynecological Malignancies-A Review of the Literature.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Diagnostic value of integratedBMC cancer · 2022Article
- Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Evaluation and Monitoring of Endometrial Cancer Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Deep Learning.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Cancer of the corpus uteri: 2021 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021Article
- Prediction of Myometrial Invasion in Stage I Endometrial Cancer by MRI: The Influence of Surgical Diagnostic Procedure.Cancers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative accurate assessment of endometrial cancer can assist in the planning of additional surgical options, and in predicting the prognosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of non-contrast PET/MRI with
methodsThirty-six patients with biopsy-proven endometrial cancer underwent preoperative
resultsAccuracy for T status was 77.8 and 75.0% for
conclusionsNon-contrast
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.