Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33092604›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2020

Comparative analysis of the lateral and posterolateral trajectories for fixation of the sacroiliac joint-a cadaveric study.

Christopher Payne, Stephen Jaffee, Isaac Swink, Daniel Cook, Matthew Yeager, Michael Oh, Gary Schmidt, Derek P Lindsey, Scott A Yerby, Boyle Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sacroiliac joint stabilization using implants provide better fixation in females compared to males: a finite element analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher PayneNeuroscience Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Stephen JaffeeNeuroscience Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Isaac SwinkNeuroscience Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Daniel CookNeuroscience Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Matthew YeagerNeuroscience Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michael OhDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Gary SchmidtOrthopaedic Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Derek P LindseySI-BONE, Inc., 471 El Camino Real, Suite 101, Santa Clara, CA, 95051, USA. dlindsey@si-bone.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2699-8190
Scott A YerbySI-BONE, Inc., 471 El Camino Real, Suite 101, Santa Clara, CA, 95051, USA.
Boyle ChengNeuroscience Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Allegheny General Hospital · USSI-Bone (United States) · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

SI-BONE, Inc. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of minimally invasive sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion solutions for placing implants exist, with reduced post-operative pain and improved outcomes compared to open procedures. The objective of this study was to compare two MIS SI joint fusion approaches that place implants directly across the joint by comparing the ilium and sacrum bone characteristics and SI joint separation along the implant trajectories.

methodsNine cadaveric specimens (n = 9) were CT scanned and the left and right ilium and sacrum were segmented. The bone density, bone volume fraction, and SI joint gap distance were calculated along lateral and posterolateral trajectories and compared using analysis of variance between the two orientations.

resultsIliac bone density, indicated by the mean Hounsfield Unit, was significantly greater for each lateral trajectory compared to posterolateral. The volume of cortical bone in the ilium was greater for the middle lateral trajectory compared to all others and for the top and bottom lateral trajectories compared to both posterolateral trajectories. Cortical density was greater in the ilium for all lateral trajectories compared to posterolateral. The bone fraction was significantly greater in all lateral trajectories compared to posterolateral in the ilium. No differences in cortical volume, cortical density, or cancellous density were found between trajectories in the sacrum. The ilium was significantly greater in density compared with the sacrum when compared irrespective of trajectory (p < 0.001). The posterolateral trajectories had a significantly larger SI joint gap than the lateral trajectories (p < 0.001).

conclusionUse of the lateral approach for minimally invasive SI fusion allows the implant to interact with bone across a significantly smaller joint space. This interaction with increased cortical bone volume and density may afford better fixation with a lower risk of pull-out or implant loosening when compared to the posterolateral approach.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityCadaverFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSacroiliac JointSpinal FusionTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultBone mineral densityLateral approachPosterolateral approachSacroiliac fusionSacroiliac jointVirtual trajectory

Identifiers

PMID33092604
PMCPMC7579994
OpenAlexW3094513131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.