Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33092586›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Medical student support for vulnerable patients during COVID-19 - a convergent mixed-methods study.

Tirion Hughes, Eleanor Beard, Amelia Bowman, Joyce Chan, Katrina Gadsby, Martha Hughes, Maya Humphries, Aaron Johnston, Georgina King, Megan Knock and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tirion HughesOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Eleanor BeardOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Amelia BowmanOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Joyce ChanOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Katrina GadsbyOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Martha HughesOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Maya HumphriesOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Aaron JohnstonOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Georgina KingOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Megan KnockOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Kaveeta MalhiOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Gerda MickuteOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Ebubechi OkpalugoOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Madeleine OliverOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Vimukthi PereraOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Florence PicklesOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Lily PollockOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Lucienne PullenOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Ffion SamuelsOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Harriet SextonOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Laura ShutlerOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Rebecca SmithOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Pippa TannerOxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK.
Emma LaddsNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 3GG, UK. e.ladds@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9864-7408
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coronavirus pandemic has exerted significant impacts on primary care, causing rapid digital transformation, exacerbating social isolation, and disrupting medical student and General Practice [GP] trainee education. Here we report on a medical student telephone initiative set-up by a final year GP trainee (the equivalent of a family medicine resident), which aimed to support patients at high risk and vulnerable to the Coronavirus Disease of 2019 [Covid-19]. In addition, it was hoped the project would mitigate a digital divide, enable proactive anticipatory planning, and provide an active learning environment to compensate for the pandemic's impact on medical education.

methodsThirty-three medical students conducted daily telephone conversations with high risk and vulnerable patients as specified by the initial NHSE published lists. They confirmed public health messages, offered details for voluntary support groups, established need for medication delivery, explored levels of digital connectivity, and prompted discussions around end-of-life choices. Students had access to online reflective resources and daily remote debriefing sessions with the GP trainee. A convergent mixed-methods evaluation was subsequently undertaken, using quantitative process and descriptive data and individual qualitative interviews were conducted according to a maximal variation sampling strategy with students, General Practitioners [GPs], and the GP trainee. Inductive thematic analysis was then applied with cross-validation, respondent validation, and rich evidential illustration aiding integrity.

resultsNinety-seven 'high risk' and 781 'vulnerable' calls were made. Individuals were generally aware of public heath information, but some struggled to interpret and apply it within their own lives. Therefore respondents felt students provided additional practical and psychological benefits, particularly with regard to strengthening the links with the community voluntary groups. The project was widely liked by students who reported high levels of skill development and widened awareness, particularly valuing the active learning environment and reflective feedback sessions.

conclusionThis study demonstrates utilization of medical students as wider assets within the primary health care team, with an initiative that enables support for vulnerable patients whilst promoting active medical education. Ongoing integration of students within 'normal' primary health care roles, such as chronic disease or mental health reviews, could provide similar opportunities for supported active and reflective learning.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Digital DivideEducation, MedicalHumansInterviews as TopicPandemicsPatient Education as TopicPneumonia, ViralTelephoneTerminal CareUnited KingdomVulnerable PopulationsCOVID-19EducationGeneral practiceMedical students

Identifiers

PMID33092586
PMCPMC7578590
OpenAlexW3093538635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.