Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33092577›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program GRADIOR for mild dementia and mild cognitive impairment: new features.

Manuel A Franco-Martín, Angie A Diaz-Baquero, Yolanda Bueno-Aguado, María T Cid-Bartolomé, Esther Parra Vidales, María V Perea Bartolomé, Isabel de la Torre Díez, Henriëtte G van der Roest

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuel A Franco-MartínPsychiatric Department, Rio Hortega University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.
Angie A Diaz-BaqueroInstitute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain. alejadiaz93@usal.es.ORCID 0000-0002-0815-4480
Yolanda Bueno-AguadoGRADIOR Department and Cognitive Research, INTRAS Foundation, Valladolid, Spain.
María T Cid-BartoloméTechnology Development, INTRAS Foundation, Valladolid, Spain.
Esther Parra VidalesIBIP Center for Clinical Care in Mental Health and Aging, INTRAS Foundation, Zamora, Spain.
María V Perea BartoloméBasic Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology Department, Salamanca University, Salamanca, Spain.
Isabel de la Torre DíezDepartment of Signal Theory and Communications, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Henriëtte G van der RoestDepartment on Aging, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos-Institute), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Fundación INTRAS · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ESTrimbos Institute · NLUniversidad de Valladolid · ES

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 676265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing number of older people and, with it, the increase of neurological impairments such as dementia has led to the implementation of the use of computer programs for cognitive rehabilitation in people with dementia. For 20 years, we have been developing the GRADIOR cognitive rehabilitation program and conducted several studies associated with its usability and effectiveness. This paper describes the development of the latest version of the GRADIOR computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program for people with different neurological etiologies, especially mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia.

resultsGRADIOR is a program that allows cognitive evaluation and rehabilitation of people affected by cognitive impairment. The new version of GRADIOR is characterized by a structure that is dynamic and flexible for both user and therapist, consisting of: Clinical Manager, Clinical History Manager, Treatment Manager and Report Manager. As a structure based on specific requirements, GRADIOR includes a series of modalities and sub-modalities, each modality comprising a series of exercises with different difficulty levels. DISCUSSION: Previous studies associated with earlier versions of GRADIOR have allowed the development of a new version of GRADIOR. Taking into account aspects associated with user experience, usability and effectiveness. Aspects that have made it possible to achieve a program that can meet the needs of older people with dementia.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCognitionCognitive DysfunctionCommunity Mental Health ServicesComputersDementiaHumansNeurological RehabilitationPsychotherapySeverity of Illness IndexSoftwareSpainTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeCognitionCommunity mental health servicesDementiaNeurological rehabilitationSoftware

Identifiers

PMID33092577
PMCPMC7584078
OpenAlexW3094549176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.