Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33092560›Full record

ReviewBMC nephrology2020

Comparison of endoscopic and pathological findings of the upper gastrointestinal tract in transplant candidate patients undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis treatment: a review of literature.

Mehmet Usta, Alparslan Ersoy, Yavuz Ayar, Gökhan Ocakoğlu, Bilgehan Yuzbasioglu, Emrullah Düzgün Erdem, Omer Erdogan

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Gastrointestinal System Endoscopy and Pathological Findings in Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease: A Single-Center Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mehmet UstaBursa City Hospital, Department of Nephrology, Nephrology Clinic, Dogankoy mevki, Nilufer, Bursa, Turkey.
Alparslan ErsoyDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Gorukle, Nilufer, Bursa, Turkey.
Yavuz AyarBursa City Hospital, Department of Nephrology, Nephrology Clinic, Dogankoy mevki, Nilufer, Bursa, Turkey. yavuzayar@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4607-9220
Gökhan OcakoğluFaculty of Medicine, Department of Bioistatistics, Uludag University, Gorukle, Nilufer, Bursa, Turkey.
Bilgehan YuzbasiogluBursa State Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology Clinic, Osmangazi, Bursa, Turkey.
Emrullah Düzgün ErdemBursa State Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology Clinic, Osmangazi, Bursa, Turkey.
Omer ErdoganDepartment of Pathology, Bursa City Hospital, Dogankoy mevki, Nilufer, Bursa, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDyspepsia is a common disorder in kidney transplant recipients, and the risk of post-transplant complications is increased in candidates with upper gastrointestinal disease. We evaluated gastrointestinal lesions of kidney transplant candidates on dialysis.

methodsIn this study, endoscopic and pathological findings in hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with gastrointestinal symptoms on the waiting list were compared.

resultsThe most common non-ulcerous lesions in the endoscopic examination were gastritis (62.3%), erosive gastritis (38.7%), duodenal erosion or duodenitis (18.9%) and esophagitis (13.2%). The ulcerous lesion was present in only 3 patients. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, ulcerated lesion and non-ulcerated lesion rates were similar in both dialysis groups. Histopathological examination revealed Helicobacter pylori (HP) positivity in 28.3% of patients. HP positivity rate was significantly higher in PD patients than in HD patients (38.7% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.046). Chronic gastritis (75.5%) was the most common pathological finding. HP positivity rate was 37.5% in patients with chronic gastritis, but HP was negative in patients without chronic gastritis. In multivariate analysis, male gender, urea and albumin levels were associated with the presence of pathological chronic gastritis. The presence of gastritis, total cholesterol and ferritin levels were found significant for HP positivity. A total cholesterol > 243 mg/dL was significantly related to an increased risk of the presence of HP positivity.

conclusionsGastrointestinal lesions and HP infection are common in dialysis patients. Dialysis modality may affect the frequency of some lesions. It may be useful to have an endoscopic examination before entering the transplant waiting list for all candidates.

Indexed as

Peritoneal DialysisRenal DialysisAdultAgedEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk FactorsUpper Gastrointestinal TractEndoscopyGastritisHelicobacter pyloriHemodialysisPeritoneal dialysisTransplant waiting list

Identifiers

PMID33092560
PMCPMC7583226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.