ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Detection of Bacterial Pathogens and Antibiotic Residues in Chicken Meat: A Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of drinking water with essential oils-organic acids blend replacing preventive antibiotics during withdrawal period on growth performance and gut health of broilers in a commercial farm.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Advances of MXene in Detection and Sterilization of Foodborne Pathogens.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhancing Chicken Fillets' Shelf Life: Synergistic Effect of Whey Protein Isolate andFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Rapid enrichment and SERS differentiation of various bacteria in skin interstitial fluid by 4-MPBA-AuNPs-functionalized hydrogel microneedles.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Article
- Study Rapid, Quantitative, and Simultaneous Detection of Drug Residues and Immunoassay in Chickens.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial Compounds FromInternational journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- A paradigm shift in the detection of bloodborne pathogens: conventional approaches to recent detection techniques.EXCLI journal · 2024Review
- Conventional and advanced detection techniques of foodborne pathogens: A comprehensive review.Heliyon · 2023Article
- First report ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023Article
- Antibiotic profiling of multidrug resistant pathogens in one-day-old chicks imported from Belgium to benin.BMC veterinary research · 2023Article
- Insights in the Development and Uses of Alternatives to Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Poultry and Swine Production.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Dual fluorescent aptasensor for simultanous and quantitative detection of sulfadimethoxine and oxytetracycin residues in animal-derived foods tissues based on mesoporous silica.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Applications of Fruit Polyphenols and Their Functionalized Nanoparticles Against Foodborne Bacteria: A Mini Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Detection of pathogenic microbes as well as antibiotic residues in food animals, especially in chicken, has become a matter of food security worldwide. The association of various pathogenic bacteria in different diseases and selective pressure induced by accumulated antibiotic residue to develop antibiotic resistance is also emerging as the threat to human health. These challenges have made the containment of pathogenic bacteria and early detection of antibiotic residue highly crucial for robust and precise detection. However, the traditional culture-based approaches are well-comprehended for identifying microbes. Nevertheless, because they are inadequate, time-consuming and laborious, these conventional methods are not predominantly used. Therefore, it has become essential to explore alternatives for the easy and robust detection of pathogenic microbes and antibiotic residue in the food source. Presently, different monitoring, as well as detection techniques like PCR-based, assay (nucleic acid)-based, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)-based, aptamer-based, biosensor-based, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry-based and electronic nose-based methods, have been developed for detecting the presence of bacterial contaminants and antibiotic residues. The current review intends to summarize the different techniques and underline the potential of every method used for the detection of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic residue in chicken meat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.