ArticleInsects2020
Bacterial Communities of
Article in Insects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Statewide surveillance of tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected in Delaware using novel multiplex PCR assays.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025Article
- Genomic and Proteomic Analyses of Bacterial Communities ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Article
- Diversity of midgut microbiota in ticks collected from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from northern Mexico.Parasites, hosts and diseases · 2024Article
- Metagenomic surveillance for bacterial tick-borne pathogens using nanopore adaptive sampling.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Genetic Diversity of Rickettsiella Symbionts in Ixodes ricinus Throughout Europe.Microbial ecology · 2022Article
- The genus Anaplasma: drawing back the curtain on tick-pathogen interactions.Pathogens and disease · 2021Review
- Current debates and advances in tick microbiome research.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021Review
- TheFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Native microbiota represent a potential resource for biocontrol of arthropod vectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.