ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Development of a Statistical Workflow for Screening Protein Extracts Based on their Nutritional Composition and Digestibility: Application to Elderly.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of the study is to develop a workflow to screen protein extracts and identify their nutritional potential as high quality nutritional culinary aids for recipes for the elderly. Twenty-seven protein extracts of animal, vegetable, and dairy origin were characterized. We studied their fate by monitoring static in vitro digestion, mimicking the physiological digestion conditions of the elderly. At the end of the gastric and intestinal phase, global measurements of digestibility and antioxidant bioactivities were performed. The statistical analysis workflow developed allowed: (i) synthesizing the compositional and nutritional information of each protein extract by creating latent variables, and (ii) comparing them. The links between variables and similarities between protein extracts were visualized using a heat map. A hierarchical cluster analysis allowed reducing the 48 quantitative variables into 15 qualitative latent variables (clusters). The application of the k-means method on each cluster enable to classify the protein extracts by level. This defined level was used as categorical value. Multiple correspondence analysis revealed groups of protein extracts with varied patterns. This workflow allowed the comparison/hierarchization between protein extracts and the creation of a tool to select the most interesting ones on the basis of their nutritional quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.