ArticleCancer research and treatment2021
Trends in Cancer Screening Rates among Korean Men and Women: Results of the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2018.
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global colorectal cancer screening programs and coverage rate estimation: an evidence synthesis.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Relationship between histological mixed-type early gastric cancer and lymph node metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Association between blood type and pulmonary thromboembolism in patients with gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Beliefs, and Behaviors Regarding Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Koreans.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sex Disparity in Cancer and Non-cancer Mortality among Korean Cancer Survivors.Journal of cancer prevention · 2025Article
- Under-recognized risk factors and low perceived breast cancer risk among rural women in South-central China: A multisite cross-sectional study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Prediction of upstaging in DCIS: the dominant role of pathological over imaging risk factors.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Long-term adherence to gastric cancer screening in South Korea: A 10-year follow-up study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- National prevention programs and their effects on gastric cancer Incidence and mortality in East Asian countries.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Article
- Determinants of Prostate Cancer Screening in Korean Men: A Nationwide Study Using the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey 2023.Cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Trends in Cancer-Screening Rates in Korea: Findings from the National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2023.Cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- A cross-national investigation of CT, MRI, PET, mammography, and radiation therapy resources and utilization.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Korean Gastric Cancer Association-Led Nationwide Survey on Surgically Treated Gastric Cancers in 2023.Journal of gastric cancer · 2025Review
- Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for breast cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2009-2021.Epidemiology and health · 2025Article
- Temporal trend in non-melanoma skin cancer mortality in China, 1992-2021: an analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in Reducing Colorectal Cancer Mortality.Cancers · 2024Article
- Pattern Anlysis of Risk-Reducing Strategies in Unaffected KoreanCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- National Statistics of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Korea.Journal of gastric cancer · 2024Article
- Association between Gastric Cancer and Osteoporosis: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study Using a National Health Sample Cohort.Cancers · 2024Article
- Risk of Subsequent Primary Cancers Among Adult-Onset 5-Year Cancer Survivors in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Korean National Cancer Screening Survey (KNCSS) is a nationwide annual cross-sectional survey conducted for the past 15 years. This study aimed to report trends in the overall screening rates of both organized and opportunistic cancer screening programs from 2004-2018. MATERIALS AND
methodsKNCSS data were collected using a structured questionnaire. For five major cancers (i.e., stomach, liver, colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer), we evaluated both the lifetime screening rate and the screening rate with recommendations. The study population included men aged 40-74 years and women aged 20-74 years with no cancer histories.
resultsScreening rate with recommendations increased from 2004 annually by 4.4% and 1.5% until 2013 for stomach and liver cancers, respectively, by 4.0% until 2012 for breast cancer, and by 3.6% and 1.2% until 2014 for colorectal and cervical cancers, respectively, followed by nonsignificant trends thereafter. In 2018, screening rates with recommendations for these cancers were 72.8%, 26.2%, 63.1%, 58.4%, and 55.6%, respectively.
conclusionScreening rates for the five types of cancer demonstrated a marked increase between 2004 and 2018. However, many recent screening rates have been flattened with nonsignificant trends, and there are lower rates for cervical cancer screening among young age groups. Steady efforts are needed to achieve higher screening participation rates overall, especially for the cervical cancer screening of young women in their 20s.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.