Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33091584›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2021

Launching the Next Steps to Improve Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellow Performance Assessment: A Look Back to the Initial Toolkit of Assessment Methods.

Laura J Morrison, Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil, Robert M Arnold, Rodney Tucker, Eva Chittenden, Sandra Sanchez-Reilly, Elise C Carey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura J MorrisonYale Palliative Care Program, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. Electronic address: laura.morrison@yale.edu.
Vyjeyanthi S PeriyakoilStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Robert M ArnoldSection of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rodney TuckerUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Eva ChittendenDivision of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sandra Sanchez-ReillyDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio and South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Elise C CareyCenter for Palliative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Stanford Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterAdmin Supp: Developing iPSC models for AD and PDP30AG066515 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer Kaci Fairchild · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
Trial of strategies to communicate genetic information to different ethnic and racial subpopulationsU54MD010724 · NIMHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD · 2016 to 2021
$16.3M
Stanford Medicine Center for Longevity and Healthy Aging Research Education CoreP30AG059307 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZOU, JAMES · 2018 to 2025
$4.9M
Palliative care needs and outcomes for dementia patientsR01AG062239 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PERIYAKOIL, VYJEYANTHI S · 2018 to 2023
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059307NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062239NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD010724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Education leaders in hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) have long acknowledged the challenge of fellow performance assessment and the need for HPM-specific fellow assessment tools. In 2010, and in alignment with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME's) directive toward competency-based medical education, the national HPM Competencies Workgroup curated a set of assessment tools, the HPM Toolkit of Assessment Methods. The Toolkit has been a resource for HPM fellowship directors in evolving practical, multifaceted fellow assessment strategies. Now, as American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine plans for a national workgroup in 2020 to define current HPM fellow assessment methods and to propose strategies to strengthen and standardize future assessment, the Toolkit provides a strong base from which to launch. However, the field learned important lessons from the 2010 Workgroup about the consensus process, gaps in areas of assessment, opportunities to address gaps with new or adapted tools, and limitations in implementing the Toolkit over time in terms of tracking, accessibility, and dissemination. This article describes the development of the Toolkit, including recommended tools and methods for assessment within each ACGME competency domain, and links the lessons learned to recommendations for the 2020 workgroup to consider in creating the next HPM assessment strategy and toolkit. Effective implementation will be crucial in supporting fellows to reach independent practice, which will further strengthen the field and workforce to provide the highest quality patient and family-centered care in serious illness. This will require an inspired, committed effort from the HPM community, which we enthusiastically anticipate.

Indexed as

Hospice CareHospicesPalliative MedicineEducation, Medical, GraduateFellowships and ScholarshipsHumansUnited Statesassessment toolscompetency-based medical educationgraduate medical educationHospice and palliative medicine fellowshippalliative care training

Identifiers

PMID33091584
PMCPMC7569474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.