Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33091369›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cell2020

Cell-Cycle-Dependent ERK Signaling Dynamics Direct Fate Specification in the Mammalian Preimplantation Embryo.

Michael J Pokrass, Kathleen A Ryan, Tianchi Xin, Brittany Pielstick, Winston Timp, Valentina Greco, Sergi Regot

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Phased ERK responsiveness and developmental robustness regulate teleost skin morphogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A concise guide to fluorescent cell cycle reporters for live-cell imaging.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J PokrassDepartment Molecular Biology and Genetics, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Biochemistry, Cellular, and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kathleen A RyanDepartment Molecular Biology and Genetics, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Tianchi XinGenetics Department, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Brittany PielstickBiochemistry, Cellular, and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, Baltimore, MD, USA; Biomedical Engineering Department, the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Winston TimpBiomedical Engineering Department, the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Valentina GrecoGenetics Department, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Sergi RegotDepartment Molecular Biology and Genetics, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: sregot@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USYale University · US

Funding

Single Cell Analysis of MAPK Signaling Dynamics in MulticellularityR35GM133499 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Sergi Regot · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the noisy nature of single cells, multicellular organisms robustly generate different cell types from one zygote. This process involves dynamic cross regulation between signaling and gene expression that is difficult to capture with fixed-cell approaches. To study signaling dynamics and fate specification during preimplantation development, we generated a transgenic mouse expressing the ERK kinase translocation reporter and measured ERK activity in single cells of live embryos. Our results show primarily active ERK in both the inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells due to fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling. Strikingly, a subset of mitotic events results in a short pulse of ERK inactivity in both daughter cells that correlates with elevated endpoint NANOG levels. Moreover, endogenous tagging of Nanog in embryonic stem cells reveals that ERK inhibition promotes enhanced stabilization of NANOG protein after mitosis. Our data show that cell cycle, signaling, and differentiation are coordinated during preimplantation development.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell LineageMAP Kinase Signaling SystemAnimalsBlastocystGerm LayersHumansMammalsMiceMitosisModels, BiologicalNanog Homeobox ProteinProtein StabilityReproducibility of ResultsNanog Homeobox Proteinblastocystcell cycleembryonic stem cellsERKNANOGpreimplantation developmentsignaling dynamics

Identifiers

PMID33091369
PMCPMC7658051
OpenAlexW3094245483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.