ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2020
The Effect of Refractive Error on Melanopsin-Driven Pupillary Responses.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spectral characteristics of light and their association with myopia progression in children: A systematic review protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
- IMI: The Role of Light in Refractive Development and Myopia: Evidence from Animal and Human Studies.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Review
- Correlation between orbital imaging features of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy and pupillary light reflex measurement.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Pupillary Light Reflex Reveals Melanopsin System Alteration in the Background of Myopia-26, the Female Limited Form of Early-Onset High Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Increase in choroidal thickness after blue light stimulation of the blind spot in young adults.Bioelectronic medicine · 2024Article
- Increase in b-wave amplitude after light stimulation of the blind spot is positively correlated with the axial length of myopic individuals.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Association Between Postillumination Pupil Response and Glaucoma Severity: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the LIGHT Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Disk Halo Size and Identification of Correlated Factors in Myopic Adults.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Ambient Light Regulates Retinal Dopamine Signaling and Myopia Susceptibility.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Human and animal studies suggest that light-mediated dopamine release may underlie the protective effect of time outdoors on myopia development. Melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells may be involved in this process by integrating ambient light exposure and regulating retinal dopamine levels. The study evaluates this potential involvement by examining whether melanopsin-driven pupillary responses are associated with adult refractive error. Methods: Subjects were 45 young adults (73% female, 24.1 ± 1.8 years) with refractive errors ranging from -6.33 D to +1.70 D. The RAPDx (Konan Medical) pupillometer measured normalized pupillary responses to three forms of square-wave light pulses alternating with darkness at 0.1 Hz: alternating long wavelength (red, peak at 608 nm) and short wavelength (blue, peak at 448 nm), followed by red only and then blue only. Results: Non-myopic subjects displayed greater pupillary constriction in the blue-only condition and slower redilation following blue light offset than subjects with myopia (P = 0.011). Pupillary responses were not significantly different between myopic and non-myopic subjects in the red-only condition (P = 0.15). More hyperopic/less myopic refractive error as a continuous variable was linearly related to larger increases in pupillary constriction in response to blue-only stimuli (r = 0.48, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Repeated light exposures to blue test stimuli resulted in an adaptation in the pupillary response (more constriction and slower redilation), presumably due to increased melanopsin-mediated input in more hyperopic/less myopic adults. This adaptive property supports a possible role for these ganglion cells in the protective effects of time outdoors on myopia development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.