Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33091116›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2020

The Effect of Refractive Error on Melanopsin-Driven Pupillary Responses.

Donald O Mutti, Shane P Mulvihill, Danielle J Orr, Patrick D Shorter, Andrew T E Hartwick

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ambient Light Regulates Retinal Dopamine Signaling and Myopia Susceptibility.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donald O MuttiThe Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Shane P MulvihillBlount County Eye Center, Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
Danielle J OrrThe Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Patrick D ShorterOptical Radiation Bioeffects Branch, Tri-Service Research Laboratory, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States.
Andrew T E HartwickThe Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
The Ohio State University · USOptica · US

Funding

University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science Program (TL1)UL1RR025755 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2008 to 2011
$26.3M
Short Term Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35EY007151 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Heather Anne Anderson · 1998 to 2026
$1.2M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025755NEI NIH HHS T35 EY007151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Human and animal studies suggest that light-mediated dopamine release may underlie the protective effect of time outdoors on myopia development. Melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells may be involved in this process by integrating ambient light exposure and regulating retinal dopamine levels. The study evaluates this potential involvement by examining whether melanopsin-driven pupillary responses are associated with adult refractive error. Methods: Subjects were 45 young adults (73% female, 24.1 ± 1.8 years) with refractive errors ranging from -6.33 D to +1.70 D. The RAPDx (Konan Medical) pupillometer measured normalized pupillary responses to three forms of square-wave light pulses alternating with darkness at 0.1 Hz: alternating long wavelength (red, peak at 608 nm) and short wavelength (blue, peak at 448 nm), followed by red only and then blue only. Results: Non-myopic subjects displayed greater pupillary constriction in the blue-only condition and slower redilation following blue light offset than subjects with myopia (P = 0.011). Pupillary responses were not significantly different between myopic and non-myopic subjects in the red-only condition (P = 0.15). More hyperopic/less myopic refractive error as a continuous variable was linearly related to larger increases in pupillary constriction in response to blue-only stimuli (r = 0.48, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Repeated light exposures to blue test stimuli resulted in an adaptation in the pupillary response (more constriction and slower redilation), presumably due to increased melanopsin-mediated input in more hyperopic/less myopic adults. This adaptive property supports a possible role for these ganglion cells in the protective effects of time outdoors on myopia development.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansHyperopiaLightMaleMelanopsinMyopiaPupilReflex, PupillaryRetinal Ganglion CellsRod OpsinsYoung AdultMelanopsinRod Opsins

Identifiers

PMID33091116
PMCPMC7594593
OpenAlexW3093574218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.