Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33091037›Full record

ReviewPloS one2020

How well are non-communicable disease services being integrated into primary health care in Africa: A review of progress against World Health Organization's African regional targets.

Azeb Gebresilassie Tesema, Whenayon Simeon Ajisegiri, Seye Abimbola, Christine Balane, Andre Pascal Kengne, Fassil Shiferaw, Jean-Marie Dangou, Padmanesan Narasimhan, Rohina Joshi, David Peiris

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Azeb Gebresilassie TesemaThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0618-4499
Whenayon Simeon AjisegiriThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia.
Seye AbimbolaThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia.
Christine BalaneThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia.
Andre Pascal KengneNon-communicable Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council & University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Fassil ShiferawWorld Health Organization, Ethiopia Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Jean-Marie DangouWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Padmanesan NarasimhanSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2020-0865
Rohina JoshiThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia.
David PeirisThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6898-3870
UNSW Sydney · AUThe University of Sydney · AUSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa · CG

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn Africa, mortality due to non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is projected to overtake the combined mortality from communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases by 2030. To address this growing NCD burden, primary health care (PHC) systems will require substantial re-orientation. In this study, we reviewed the progress of African countries towards integrating essential NCD services into PHC.

methodsA review of World Health Organization (WHO) reports was conducted for all 47 countries in the WHO African Region. To report each country's progress, we used an a priori framework developed by the WHO regional office for Africa (AFRO). Twelve indicators were used to measure countries' progress. The proportion of countries meeting each indicator was tabulated using a heat map. Correlation between country income status and attainment of each indicator was also assessed.

findingsNo country met all the recommended indicators to integrate NCD services into PHC and seven countries met none of the indicators. Few countries (30%) had nationally approved guidelines for NCD management and very few reported availabilities of all essential NCD medicines (13%) and technologies (11%) in PHC facilities. There was no overall correlation between a country's GDP per capita and the aggregate of targets being met (rho = 0.23; P = .12). There was, however, a modestly negative correlation between out-of-pocket expenditure and overall country progress (rho = -0.58; P < .001).

conclusionProgress by AFRO Member States in integrating NCD care into PHC is variable across the region. Enhanced government commitment and judicious resource allocation to prioritize NCDs are needed. Particular areas of focus include increasing the uptake of simplified guidelines for NCDs; increasing workforce capacity to manage NCDs; and removing access barriers to essential medicines and basic diagnostic technologies.

Indexed as

AfricaDelivery of Health CareGlobal HealthHealth ExpendituresHumansNoncommunicable DiseasesPrimary Health CareWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID33091037
PMCPMC7580905
OpenAlexW3093812263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.