Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33090989›Full record

ReviewPLoS computational biology2020

Misuse of the Michaelis-Menten rate law for protein interaction networks and its remedy.

Jae Kyoung Kim, John J Tyson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Building Localized NADP(H) Recycling Circuits to Advance Enzyme Cascadetronics.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. From homogeneity to heterogeneity: Refining stochastic simulations of gene regulation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jae Kyoung KimDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7842-2172
John J TysonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7560-6013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over a century, the Michaelis-Menten (MM) rate law has been used to describe the rates of enzyme-catalyzed reactions and gene expression. Despite the ubiquity of the MM rate law, it accurately captures the dynamics of underlying biochemical reactions only so long as it is applied under the right condition, namely, that the substrate is in large excess over the enzyme-substrate complex. Unfortunately, in circumstances where its validity condition is not satisfied, especially so in protein interaction networks, the MM rate law has frequently been misused. In this review, we illustrate how inappropriate use of the MM rate law distorts the dynamics of the system, provides mistaken estimates of parameter values, and makes false predictions of dynamical features such as ultrasensitivity, bistability, and oscillations. We describe how these problems can be resolved with a slightly modified form of the MM rate law, based on the total quasi-steady state approximation (tQSSA). Furthermore, we show that the tQSSA can be used for accurate stochastic simulations at a lower computational cost than using the full set of mass-action rate laws. This review describes how to use quasi-steady state approximations in the right context, to prevent drawing erroneous conclusions from in silico simulations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationKineticsModels, StatisticalProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsReproducibility of ResultsStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID33090989
PMCPMC7581366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.