Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33090919›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2021

Factors predicting timely implementation of radiotherapy innovations: the first model.

Rachelle R Swart, Maria Jg Jacobs, Cheryl Roumen, Ruud Ma Houben, Folkert Koetsveld, Liesbeth J Boersma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachelle R SwartDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1884-5071
Maria Jg JacobsTilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Cheryl RoumenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ruud Ma HoubenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Folkert KoetsveldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Liesbeth J BoersmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe improvement of radiotherapy depends largely on the implementation of innovations, of which effectivity varies widely. The aim of this study is to develop a prediction model for successful innovation implementation in radiotherapy to improve effective management of innovation projects.

methodsA literature review was performed to identify success factors for innovation implementation. Subsequently, in two large academic radiotherapy centres in the Netherlands, an inventory was made of all innovation projects executed between 2011 and 2017. Semi-structured interviews were performed to record the presence/absence of the success factors found in the review for each project. Successful implementation was defined as timely implementation, yes/no. Cross-tables, Χ

resultsFrom the 163 identified innovation projects, only 54% were successfully implemented. We found 31 success factors in literature of which 14 were significantly related to successful implementation in the innovation projects in our study. The prediction model contained the following determinants: (1) sufficient and competent employees, (2) complexity, (3) understanding/awareness of the project goals and process by employees, (4) feasibility and desirability. The area Under the curve (AUC) of the prediction model was 0.86 (0.8-0.92, 95% CI).

conclusionA prediction model was developed for successful implementation of innovation in radiotherapy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This prediction model is the first of its kind and, after external validation, could be widely applicable to predict the timely implementation of radiotherapy innovations.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationOrganizational InnovationHumansModels, OrganizationalNetherlandsRadiation Oncology

Identifiers

PMID33090919
PMCPMC7774677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.