Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33090908›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2020

Two weeks of remote ischemic conditioning improves brachial artery flow mediated dilation in chronic stroke survivors.

Allison S Hyngstrom, Jennifer N Nguyen, Michael T Wright, Sergey S Tarima, Brian D Schmit, David D Gutterman, Matthew J Durand

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Peripheral vascular function in stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke: A critical systematic review.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Promoting Resiliency to Stress in the Vascular Endothelium.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allison S HyngstromDepartment of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Jennifer N NguyenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Michael T WrightDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Sergey S TarimaInstitute of Health and Equity, Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Brian D SchmitDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-3616-8388
David D GuttermanDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0003-2814-7867
Matthew J DurandDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-1416-1652
Medical College of Wisconsin · USMarquette University · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001436 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FREED, JULIE K · 2015 to 2025
$47.5M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001438 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI WIDLANSKY, MICHAEL E · 2015 to 2024
$2.9M
Ischemic Conditioning and Improved Motor Function Post StrokeR01HD099340 · NICHD · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI DURAND, MATTHEW, HYNGSTROM, ALLISON SUZANNE · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001438NCATS NIH HHS KL2-TR-001438NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001436NCATS NIH HHS UL1-TR-001436NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099340NICHD NIH HHS R01HD099340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many stroke survivors have reduced cardiorespiratory fitness as a result of their stroke. Ischemic conditioning (IC) is a noninvasive, cost-effective, easy-to-administer intervention that can be performed at home and has been shown to improve both motor function in stroke survivors and vascular endothelial function in healthy individuals. In this study, we examined the effects of 2 wk of remote IC (RIC) on brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD) in chronic stroke survivors. We hypothesized that FMD would be improved following RIC compared with a sham RIC control group. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study. Twenty-four chronic stroke survivors (>6 mo after stroke) were enrolled and randomized to receive either RIC or sham RIC on their affected thigh every other day for 2 wk. For the RIC group, a blood pressure cuff was inflated to 225 mmHg for 5 min, followed by 5 min of recovery, and repeated a total of five times per session. For the sham RIC group, the inflation pressure was 10 mmHg. Brachial artery FMD was assessed on the nonaffected arm at study enrollment and following the 2-wk intervention period. Nine men and fourteen women completed all study procedures. Brachial artery FMD increased from 5.4 ± 4.8 to 7.8 ± 4.4% (

Indexed as

Brachial ArteryStrokeDilatationDouble-Blind MethodEndothelium, VascularFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRegional Blood FlowSurvivorsVasodilationbrachial artery reactivityendothelial dysfunctionrehabilitationstrokevasodilation

Identifiers

PMID33090908
PMCPMC7792845
OpenAlexW3094091783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.