Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33090598›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2020

Reference state and benchmark concepts for better biodiversity conservation in contemporary ecosystems.

Megan J McNellie, Ian Oliver, Josh Dorrough, Simon Ferrier, Graeme Newell, Philip Gibbons

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Contribution of Home Gardens to Sustainable Development: Perspectives from A Supported Opinion Essay.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Habitat-based biodiversity assessment for ecosystem accounting in the Murray-Darling Basin.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan J McNellieDepartment of Planning, Industry and Environment, Science, Economics and Insights Division, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8162-2551
Ian OliverDepartment of Planning, Industry and Environment, Science, Economics and Insights Division, Gosford, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3276-6644
Josh DorroughDepartment of Planning, Industry and Environment, Science, Economics and Insights Division, Merimbula, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7099-1442
Simon FerrierCSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7884-2388
Graeme NewellDepartment of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.
Philip GibbonsFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6454-1306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring the status and trends of biodiversity is critical for making informed decisions about the conservation, management or restoration of species, habitats and ecosystems. Defining the reference state against which status and change are measured is essential. Typically, reference states describe historical conditions, yet historical conditions are challenging to quantify, may be difficult to falsify, and may no longer be an attainable target in a contemporary ecosystem. We have constructed a conceptual framework to help inform thinking and discussion around the philosophical underpinnings of reference states and guide their application. We characterize currently recognized historical reference states and describe them as Pre-Human, Indigenous Cultural, Pre-Intensification and Hybrid-Historical. We extend the conceptual framework to include contemporary reference states as an alternative theoretical perspective. The contemporary reference state framework is a major conceptual shift that focuses on current ecological patterns and identifies areas with higher biodiversity values relative to other locations within the same ecosystem, regardless of the disturbance history. We acknowledge that past processes play an essential role in driving contemporary patterns of diversity. The specific context for which we design the contemporary conceptual frame is underpinned by an overarching goal-to maximize biodiversity conservation and restoration outcomes in existing ecosystems. The contemporary reference state framework can account for the inherent differences in the diversity of biodiversity values (e.g. native species richness, habitat complexity) across spatial scales, communities and ecosystems. In contrast to historical reference states, contemporary references states are measurable and falsifiable. This 'road map of reference states' offers perspective needed to define and assess the status and trends in biodiversity and habitats. We demonstrate the contemporary reference state concept with an example from south-eastern Australia. Our framework provides a tractable way for policy-makers and practitioners to navigate biodiversity assessments to maximize conservation and restoration outcomes in contemporary ecosystems.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemBenchmarkingBiodiversityHumansSouth Australiabenchmarkcompositionconceptual frameworkconservationreference staterestorationstructurevegetation

Identifiers

PMID33090598
PMCPMC7756865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.