Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33090511›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in psychiatric care2020

"People just don't understand their role in it." Collaboration and coordination of care for service users with complex and severe mental health problems.

Eva Biringer, Oddbjørn Hove, Øivind Johnsen, Haldis Økland Lier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in psychiatric care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Service User and Carer Views and Expectations of Mental Health Nurses: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Person-centred suicide prevention: key elements from the perspective of people living with suicidality.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva BiringerSection of Research and Innovation, Helse Fonna HF, Stord, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0933-1079
Oddbjørn HoveSection of Research and Innovation, Helse Fonna HF, Stord, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6637-6815
Øivind JohnsenStord Community Mental Health Center, Helse Fonna HF, Stord, Norway.
Haldis Økland LierHelse Fonna HF, Haugesund, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6116-5090

Funding

Helse Vest 911668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore professionals' and service users' experiences and perceptions of interprofessional collaboration and coordination for service users with complex and severe mental health issues. DESIGN AND

methodsA qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews of professionals and individual interviews of service users. Data were analyzed by thematic analysis.

findingsParticipants described challenges and suggested improvements concerning Distribution of roles, responsibilities, and tasks; Communication; and Knowledge and attitudes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Mental health nurses and other professional helpers should have a particular focus on common aims, clear division of roles, planning and timing of interventions, and communication with other professionals and service users.

Indexed as

collaborationcontinuity of carecoordinationmental health care

Identifiers

PMID33090511
PMCPMC8247357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.