Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33090378›Full record

ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2021

Review and Study of Uterine Bioelectrical Waveforms and Vector Analysis to Identify Electrical and Mechanosensitive Transduction Control Mechanisms During Labor in Pregnant Patients.

R E Garfield, Lauren Murphy, Kendra Gray, Bruce Towe

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R E GarfieldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA. drrobertgarfiel@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4938-3781
Lauren MurphyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Kendra GrayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Bruce ToweDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · USArizona State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bioelectrical signals that produce uterine contractions during parturition are not completely understood. The objectives are as follows: (1) to review the literature and information concerning uterine biopotential waveforms generated by the uterus, known to produce contractions, and evaluate mechanotransduction in pregnant patients using electromyographic (EMG) recording methods and (2) to study a new approach, uterine vector analysis, commonly used for the heart: vectorcardiography analysis. The patients used in this study were as follows: (1) patients at term not in labor (n = 3); (2) patients during the 1st stage of labor at cervical dilations from 2 to 10 cm (n = 30); and (3) patients in the 2nd stage of labor and during delivery (n = 3). We used DC-coupled electrodes and PowerLab hardware (model no. PL2604, ADInstruments, Castle Hill, Australia), with software (LabChart, ADInstruments) for storage and analysis of biopotentials. Uterine and abdominal EMG recordings were made from the surface of each patient using 3 electrode pairs with 1 pair (+ and -, with a 31-cm spacing distance) placed in the right/left position (X position) and with 1 pair placed in an up/down position (Y position, also 31 cm apart) and with the third pair at the front/back (Z position). Using signals from the three X, Y, and Z electrodes, slow (0.03 to 0.1 Hz, high amplitude) and fast wave (0.3 to 1 Hz, low amplitude) biopotentials were recorded. The amplitudes of the slow waves and fast waves were significantly higher during the 2nd stage of labor compared to the 1st stage (respectively, p = 9.54 × e

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularUterine ContractionAnimalsBiological ClocksElectromyographyFemaleHumansLabor, ObstetricMembrane PotentialsModels, BiologicalMyometriumParturitionPeriodicityPregnancyTime FactorsElectromyographyLaborMyometriumParturitionUterine electrical activityUterine mechanotransductionUterusVector electromyometriography

Identifiers

PMID33090378
OpenAlexW3094525960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.