ArticleTargeted oncology2020
Cetuximab in Patients with Breast Cancer, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Ovarian Cancer Without KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF Mutations: Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study.
Article in Targeted oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02693535 (Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk and Benefit for Basket Trials in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Targeted oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Precision Oncology Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Phase II Clinical Trials with Biomarker-Driven, Adaptive Design.Cancer research and treatment · 2024Pooled it
- Unlocking the Potential: A Systematic Review of Master Protocol in Pediatrics.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Pooled it
- Perspectives of EGFR co-targeting with nanocarriers for anti-TNBC purposes.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Regorafenib in Patients With Solid Tumors WithJCO precision oncology · 2024Article
- Moving toward precision medicine to predict drug sensitivity in patients with metastatic breast cancer.ESMO open · 2024Review
- Cobimetinib Plus Vemurafenib in Patients With Solid Tumors WithJCO precision oncology · 2023Article
- Biomarker-Driven Oncology Clinical Trials: Novel Designs in the Era of Precision Medicine.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2023Review
- Article
- Review
- The Role of Master Protocols in Pediatric Drug Development.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2022Review
- Challenges and Obstacles in Applying Therapeutical Indications Formulated in Molecular Tumor Boards.Cancers · 2022Review
- Therapeutic potential of CDK4/6 inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma.Nature reviews. Urology · 2022Review
- Article
- Cerebral Metastasis of Common Cancers.Cancers · 2020Article
- Next Generation Sequencing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pitfalls and Opportunities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study, a phase II basket study, evaluates anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in patients with advanced cancers harboring genomic alterations known as drug targets.
objectiveWith no known genomic targets predictive of sensitivity to cetuximab, cetuximab was evaluated in patients with breast cancer (BC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and ovarian cancer (OC), without KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations. PATIENTS AND
methodsEligible patients with advanced BC, NSCLC, and OC received a cetuximab loading dose, then weekly infusions (250 mg/m
resultsPatients with BC (n = 10), NSCLC (n = 10), and OC (n = 29) were enrolled between June 2016 and September 2018. No objective responses or stable disease for at least 16 weeks were observed in the BC and NSCLC cohorts. No objective responses and four patients with stable disease for at least 16 weeks were observed in the OC cohort. Six of 49 patients reported grade 3 or higher adverse events or serious adverse events at least possibly related to cetuximab.
conclusionsCetuximab does not have clinical activity in patients with advanced BC, NSCLC, and OC without KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations. CLINICAL
trial registrationNCT02693535 (26 February, 2016).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.