Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33090284›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2021

Retrospective analysis for the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in advanced gastric cancer patients according to ascites burden.

Hirosumi Suzuki, Takeshi Yamada, Akinori Sugaya, Shunsuke Ueyama, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Toshikazu Moriwaki, Ichinosuke Hyodo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab in advanced gastric cancer: the DELIVER trial (JACCRO GC-08).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hirosumi SuzukiDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1, Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
Takeshi YamadaDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1, Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan. t.yamada718@md.tsukuba.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7848-5827
Akinori SugayaDivision of Gastroenterology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, 6528, Koibuchi, Kasama, Ibaraki, Japan.
Shunsuke UeyamaDivision of Gastroenterology, Tsuchiura Kyodo Hospital, 4-1-1, Ootsuno, Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yoshiyuki YamamotoDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1, Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
Toshikazu MoriwakiDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1, Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
Ichinosuke HyodoDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1, Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
University of Tsukuba Hospital · JPIbaraki Prefectural Central Hospital · JPTsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNivolumab is a standard later-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, few reports exist about its efficacy and safety in patients with massive ascites.

methodsWe retrospectively collected clinical data from 72 AGC patients who received nivolumab administration at least once from Oct 2017 to Feb 2019 and studied their clinical outcomes dividing into two groups: 50 patients with no or localized ascites in the pelvic cavity or liver surface (LAB: low ascites burden) and 22 patients with massive ascites (HAB: high ascites burden).

resultsMedian overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months (95% CI 3.4-7.3) in the LAB group and 2.5 months (95% CI 0.0-5.0) in the HAB group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis for OS revealed blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.83, p = 0.013) as an independent prognostic factor. Response rates in the patients with measurable lesions were 16% (7/43) and 8% (1/12) in the LAB and HAB groups, respectively. Ascites decreased or disappeared in 6 HAB patients (27%) and these responders had a prolonged OS of median 9.7 months (95% CI 3.6-15.8). The median time to ascites response was 1.3 months (95% CI 0.8-1.9). These responders have lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios than 5.0 at the start of nivolumab. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 23% of HAB and 18% of LAB patients.

conclusionsNivolumab could improve massive ascites and confer survival benefit for some AGC patients. Considering a similar incidence of immune-related adverse events, it would be a recommended treatment option for AGC with massive ascites.

Indexed as

NivolumabStomach NeoplasmsAscitesHumansLymphocyte CountLymphocytesNeutrophilsRetrospective StudiesNivolumabAscitesGastric cancerNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID33090284
OpenAlexW3093660586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.