Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33090282›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Autologous neurosensory free-flap retinal transplantation for refractory chronic macular hole-outcomes evaluated by OCT, microperimetry, and multifocal electroretinography.

Xhevat Lumi, Sanja Petrovic Pajic, Maja Sustar, Ana Fakin, Marko Hawlina

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimal approaches for managing recurrent macular holes: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Outcomes of amniotic membrane transplant for refractory macular hole - an optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence long-term study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A retrospective, multicenter study on the management of macular holes without residual internal limiting membrane: the refractory macular hole (ReMaHo) study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  12. Logbook of a Retinal Autograft.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Update on surgical management of complex macular holes: a review.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Xhevat LumiEye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Grablovičeva 46, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. xhlumi@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9865-4111
Sanja Petrovic PajicEye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Grablovičeva 46, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maja SustarEye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Grablovičeva 46, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ana FakinEye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Grablovičeva 46, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marko HawlinaEye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Grablovičeva 46, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report the safety, anatomical and functional outcomes of autologous neurosensory retinal transplant in patients with a refractory large unclosed macular hole. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis is a prospective case series of four patients with large chronic macular hole that underwent vitrectomy and free-flap neurosensory retinal transplantation surgery with silicone oil tamponade. The hole was closed with an autologous retinal transplant of an approximate diameter of 1.5-1.8 mm, harvested outside the vascular arcades. Anatomical and functional outcomes were assessed using best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA-Snellen), optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography, microperimetry (MP), and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG).

resultsThere were 2 male and 2 female patients with median age of 73 (60-81) years. The median follow-up period was 17 (13-23) months. The median preoperative size of the macular hole was 1872.5 (868-2591) μm at the widest basal diameter and 828 (556-1099) μm at the minimum diameter. Surgery resulted in the anatomical closure of the macular hole in all cases. The OCT showed structural integration of the transplant and reappearance of the inner segment ellipsoid to different extents. The BCVA improved from preoperative 0.1 (6/60; + 1.0 logMAR), 0.1 (6/60; + 1.0 logMAR), 0.05 (6/120; + 1.3 logMAR), and 0.005 (6/1200; + 2.3 logMAR) to 0.2 (6/30; + 0.7 logMAR) postoperatively in cases 1, 2, and 4, and to 0.1 (6/60; + 1.0 logMAR) in case 3. MP showed retinal function in the region corresponding to the area of the transplant (circle of 1.8 mm in diameter) in all patients after the surgery (median sensitivity in that region was 4.0 dB, range 1.8-12.4 dB). Improvement was noted in the patient that had MP performed before the surgery (mean sensitivity improved from 0 to 1.8 dB). Detectable function was mostly located in the peripheral regions of the transplant. Multifocal ERG showed abnormal function of the central ring and normal function of the second ring in 3 of 4 cases. The OCT angiography showed normal perfusion, without signs of neovascularization. There were no intra- or postoperative complications.

conclusionAutologous retinal transplantation surgery is a successful technique for closing of large refractory macular holes. The procedure is safe and provides good anatomical results. Visual acuity, microperimetry, and mfERG suggest some gradual functional integration of outer regions of the transplants, but no central functional restitution has been detected as yet.

Indexed as

Retinal PerforationsAgedAged, 80 and overElectroretinographyFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Field TestsVitrectomyEllipsoid zone restorationMacular surgeryMicroperimetryMultifocal ERGRefractory chronic macular holeRetinal free-flap transplantationVitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID33090282
OpenAlexW3094245513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.