Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33090113›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Understanding the Uptake of Big Data in Health Care: Protocol for a Multinational Mixed-Methods Study.

Rik Wehrens, Vikrant Sihag, Sandra Sülz, Hilco van Elten, Erik van Raaij, Antoinette de Bont, Anne Marie Weggelaar-Jansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rik Wehrens *Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6141-9863
Vikrant Sihag *Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4299-5467
Sandra Sülz *Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2354-1307
Hilco van Elten *Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3909-5521
Erik van Raaij *Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3758-5431
Antoinette de Bont *Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0745-4537
Anne Marie Weggelaar-Jansen *Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7786-6326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the high potential of big data, their applications in health care face many organizational, social, financial, and regulatory challenges. The societal dimensions of big data are underrepresented in much medical research. Little is known about integrating big data applications in the corporate routines of hospitals and other care providers. Equally little is understood about embedding big data applications in daily work practices and how they lead to actual improvements for health care actors, such as patients, care professionals, care providers, information technology companies, payers, and the society.

objectiveThis planned study aims to provide an integrated analysis of big data applications, focusing on the interrelations among concrete big data experiments, organizational routines, and relevant systemic and societal dimensions. To understand the similarities and differences between interactions in various contexts, the study covers 12 big data pilot projects in eight European countries, each with its own health care system. Workshops will be held with stakeholders to discuss the findings, our recommendations, and the implementation. Dissemination is supported by visual representations developed to share the knowledge gained.

methodsThis study will utilize a mixed-methods approach that combines performance measurements, interviews, document analysis, and cocreation workshops. Analysis will be structured around the following four key dimensions: performance, embedding, legitimation, and value creation. Data and their interrelations across the dimensions will be synthesized per application and per country.

resultsThe study was funded in August 2017. Data collection started in April 2018 and will continue until September 2021. The multidisciplinary focus of this study enables us to combine insights from several social sciences (health policy analysis, business administration, innovation studies, organization studies, ethics, and health services research) to advance a holistic understanding of big data value realization. The multinational character enables comparative analysis across the following eight European countries: Austria, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Given that national and organizational contexts change over time, it will not be possible to isolate the factors and actors that explain the implementation of big data applications. The visual representations developed for dissemination purposes will help to reduce complexity and clarify the relations between the various dimensions.

conclusionsThis study will develop an integrated approach to big data applications that considers the interrelations among concrete big data experiments, organizational routines, and relevant systemic and societal dimensions. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/16779.

Indexed as

balance score cardbig databusiness modelingethicsgovernmental regulationimplementationinnovationlegitimacyperformanceregulationsocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID33090113
PMCPMC7644380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.