ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Efficiency of Computer-Aided Facial Phenotyping (DeepGestalt) in Individuals With and Without a Genetic Syndrome: Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Short paths to diagnosis with artificial intelligence: systematic literature review on diagnostic decision support systems].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Pooled it
- Early identification of Prader-Willi syndrome in newborns using facial phenotype-based machine learning.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Utility of Face2Gene's DeepGestalt and D-Score applications in paediatric neurodevelopmental disorders in South Africa.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Genetics: Current Applications and Challenges.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric neuroimaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence, Connected Care, and Enabling Digital Health Technologies in Rare Diseases With a Focus on Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Workflow analysis and evaluation of a next-generation phenotyping tool: A qualitative study of Face2Gene.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- AI-Based Facial Phenotyping Supports a Shared Molecular Axis inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Analysis of Facial Photographs for Predicting Bicuspid Aortic Valve.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Article
- Automated Multi-Class Facial Syndrome Classification Using Transfer Learning Techniques.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Computer-aided diagnostic screen for Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome with facial phenotype.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- Validation of 3 Computer-Aided Facial Phenotyping Tools (DeepGestalt, GestaltMatcher, and D-Score): Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Integrative analysis of transcriptome dynamics during human craniofacial development identifies candidate disease genes.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The future role of facial image analysis in ACMG classification guidelines.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023Article
- Facial clues to the photosensitive trichothiodystrophy phenotype in childhood.Journal of human genetics · 2023Article
- Computer-aided facial analysis as a tool to identify patients with Silver-Russell syndrome and Prader-Willi syndrome.European journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Facial features of lysosomal storage disorders.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2022Article
- Case Report: The success of face analysis technology in extremely rare genetic diseases in Korea: Tatton-Brown-Rahman syndrome and Say-Barber -Biesecker-Young-Simpson variant of ohdo syndrome.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Genetic syndromes screening by facial recognition technology: VGG-16 screening model construction and evaluation.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCollectively, an estimated 5% of the population have a genetic disease. Many of them feature characteristics that can be detected by facial phenotyping. Face2Gene CLINIC is an online app for facial phenotyping of patients with genetic syndromes. DeepGestalt, the neural network driving Face2Gene, automatically prioritizes syndrome suggestions based on ordinary patient photographs, potentially improving the diagnostic process. Hitherto, studies on DeepGestalt's quality highlighted its sensitivity in syndromic patients. However, determining the accuracy of a diagnostic methodology also requires testing of negative controls.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate DeepGestalt's accuracy with photos of individuals with and without a genetic syndrome. Moreover, we aimed to propose a machine learning-based framework for the automated differentiation of DeepGestalt's output on such images.
methodsFrontal facial images of individuals with a diagnosis of a genetic syndrome (established clinically or molecularly) from a convenience sample were reanalyzed. Each photo was matched by age, sex, and ethnicity to a picture featuring an individual without a genetic syndrome. Absence of a facial gestalt suggestive of a genetic syndrome was determined by physicians working in medical genetics. Photos were selected from online reports or were taken by us for the purpose of this study. Facial phenotype was analyzed by DeepGestalt version 19.1.7, accessed via Face2Gene CLINIC. Furthermore, we designed linear support vector machines (SVMs) using Python 3.7 to automatically differentiate between the 2 classes of photographs based on DeepGestalt's result lists.
resultsWe included photos of 323 patients diagnosed with 17 different genetic syndromes and matched those with an equal number of facial images without a genetic syndrome, analyzing a total of 646 pictures. We confirm DeepGestalt's high sensitivity (top 10 sensitivity: 295/323, 91%). DeepGestalt's syndrome suggestions in individuals without a craniofacially dysmorphic syndrome followed a nonrandom distribution. A total of 17 syndromes appeared in the top 30 suggestions of more than 50% of nondysmorphic images. DeepGestalt's top scores differed between the syndromic and control images (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] curve 0.72, 95% CI 0.68-0.76; P<.001). A linear SVM running on DeepGestalt's result vectors showed stronger differences (AUROC 0.89, 95% CI 0.87-0.92; P<.001).
conclusionsDeepGestalt fairly separates images of individuals with and without a genetic syndrome. This separation can be significantly improved by SVMs running on top of DeepGestalt, thus supporting the diagnostic process of patients with a genetic syndrome. Our findings facilitate the critical interpretation of DeepGestalt's results and may help enhance it and similar computer-aided facial phenotyping tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.