Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33090107›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Opportunities and Challenges Surrounding the Use of Data From Wearable Sensor Devices in Health Care: Qualitative Interview Study.

Ijeoma Azodo, Robin Williams, Aziz Sheikh, Kathrin Cresswell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Returning Individualized Wearable Sensor Results to Older Adult Research Participants: A Pilot Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. [Research progress in application of intelligent remote follow-up mode in hip and knee arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Security Risks and User Perception towards Adopting Wearable Internet of Medical Things.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ijeoma AzodoUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4888-4250
Robin WilliamsInstitute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9044-4611
Aziz SheikhUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7022-3056
Kathrin CresswellUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6634-9537

Funding

Chief Scientist Office
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable sensors connected via networked devices have the potential to generate data that may help to automate processes of care, engage patients, and increase health care efficiency. The evidence of effectiveness of such technologies is, however, nascent and little is known about unintended consequences.

objectiveOur objective was to explore the opportunities and challenges surrounding the use of data from wearable sensor devices in health care.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative, theoretically informed, interview-based study to purposefully sample international experts in health care, technology, business, innovation, and social sciences, drawing on sociotechnical systems theory. We used in-depth interviews to capture perspectives on development, design, and use of data from wearable sensor devices in health care, and employed thematic analysis of interview transcripts with NVivo to facilitate coding.

resultsWe interviewed 16 experts. Although the use of data from wearable sensor devices in health and care has significant potential in improving patient engagement, there are a number of issues that stakeholders need to negotiate to realize these benefits. These issues include the current gap between data created and meaningful interpretation in health and care contexts, integration of data into health care professional decision making, negotiation of blurring lines between consumer and medical care, and pervasive monitoring of health across previously disconnected contexts.

conclusionsStakeholders need to actively negotiate existing challenges to realize the integration of data from wearable sensor devices into electronic health records. Viewing wearables as active parts of a connected digital health and care infrastructure, in which various business, personal, professional, and health system interests align, may help to achieve this.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalMaleQualitative ResearchWearable Electronic Devicesdatahealth carequalitativewearable sensor devices

Identifiers

PMID33090107
PMCPMC7644375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.