Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33090086›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2021

Rotavirus A, C, and H in Brazilian pigs: potential for zoonotic transmission of RVA.

Patrícia S Flores, Fábio B Costa, Ariane R Amorim, Gabriella S Mendes, Miguel Rojas, Norma Santos

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diversity of species and genotypes of rotavirus field strains in a diarrhea outbreak in suckling piglets from an unvaccinated pig herd.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rotaviruses A and C in dairy cattle in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Patrícia S FloresInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fábio B CostaInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ariane R AmorimInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gabriella S MendesInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Miguel RojasInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5029-3874
Norma SantosInstituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5123-9172
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rotaviruses (RVs) have been identified as one of the main infectious causes of diarrhea in young pigs. We determined the prevalence of rotavirus A (RVA), C (RVC), and H (RVH) in pigs on a Brazilian farm. Samples were screened by reverse-transcription (RT)-PCR, and samples positive for RVA were genotyped by PCR amplification and sequencing analysis. Of the 329 fecal samples analyzed, 102 (30.9%) were positive for RV, 25 (7.6%) contained RVA only, 32 (9.7%) contained RVC only, and 31 (9.4%) contained RVH only. Co-circulation, the presence of ≥ 2 RVs in a sample, was detected in 14 (4.2%) samples. Of the 15 animals with diarrhea, 6 (40%) were positive for RV, and of the 314 asymptomatic animals, 96 (30.6%) were positive for RV; there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (

Indexed as

AnimalsBrazilDiarrheaFecesGenotypePrevalenceRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsSus scrofaSwineSwine DiseasesZoonosesepidemiologygenotypingrotavirusswineviral diarrheazoonosis

Identifiers

PMID33090086
PMCPMC7758689
OpenAlexW3094539614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.