Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089730›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular structure & dynamics2022

Screening of phytochemicals as potent inhibitor of 3-chymotrypsin and papain-like proteases of SARS-CoV2: an in silico approach to combat COVID-19.

Ananta Swargiary, Shafi Mahmud, Md Abu Saleh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. In silico Screening of Potential SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibitors fromAdvances and applications in bioinformatics and chemistry : AABC · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Virtual Screening ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Antiviral Potential of Plants against COVID-19 during Outbreaks-An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ananta SwargiaryDepartment of Zoology, Bodoland University, Kokrajhar, Assam, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9594-3666
Shafi MahmudMicrobiology Laboratory, Bioinformatics Division, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1604-8626
Md Abu SalehMicrobiology Laboratory, Bioinformatics Division, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.
University of Rajshahi · BDBodoland University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 and its causative organism SARS-CoV2 that emerged from Wuhan city, China have paralyzed the world. With no clinically approved drugs, the global health system is struggling to find an effective treatment measure. At this crucial juncture, screening of plant-derived compounds may be an effective strategy to combat COVID-19. The present study investigated the binding affinity of phytocompounds with 3-Chymotrypsin-like (3CLpro) and Papain-like proteases (PLpro) of SARS-CoV2 using

Indexed as

COVID-19ChymotrypsinHumansMolecular Docking SimulationPapainPeptide HydrolasesPhytochemicalsRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2ChymotrypsinPapainPeptide HydrolasesPhytochemicalsRNA, Viral3CLprodockingPhytocompoundsPLproSARS-CoV2

Identifiers

PMID33089730
PMCPMC7594184
OpenAlexW3093567485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.