Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089712›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2022

Spine Patient Satisfaction With Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Alexander M Satin, Kartik Shenoy, Evan D Sheha, Bryce Basques, Gregory D Schroeder, Alexander R Vaccaro, Isador H Lieberman, Richard D Guyer, Peter B Derman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Telerehabilitation is as effective as outpatient visits in the management of early osteoarthritis knee and mechanical low backache.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Patient perspectives of telehealth for fertility care: a national survey.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Scoliosis Management through Apps and Software Tools.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Telemedicine in Emergency Medicine in the COVID-19 Pandemic-Experiences and Prospects-A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  15. SPINE20 recommendations 2021: spine care for people's health and prosperity.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexander M SatinTexas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9181-7494
Kartik ShenoyRothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Evan D ShehaRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4339-6079
Bryce BasquesRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-8701
Gregory D SchroederRothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexander R VaccaroRothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Isador H LiebermanTexas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA.
Richard D GuyerTexas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA.
Peter B DermanTexas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designOriginal research, cross-sectional study.

objectivesEvaluate patient satisfaction with spine care delivered via telemedicine. Identify patient- and visit-based factors associated with increased satisfaction and visit preference.

methodsTelemedicine visits with a spine surgeon at 2 practices in the United States between March and May 2020 were eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients were sent an electronic survey recording overall satisfaction, technical or clinical issues encountered, and preference for a telemedicine versus an in-person visit. Factors associated with poor satisfaction and preference of telemedicine over an in-person visit were identified using multivariate logistic regression.

resultsA total of 772 responses were collected. Overall, 87.7% of patients were satisfied with their telemedicine visit and 45% indicated a preference for a telemedicine visit over an in-person visit if given the option. Patients with technical or clinical issues were significantly less likely to achieve 5 out of 5 satisfaction scores and were significantly more likely to prefer an in-person visit. Patients who live less than 5 miles from their surgeon's office and patients older than 60 years were also significantly more likely to prefer in-person visits.

conclusionsSpine telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with high patient satisfaction. Additionally, 45% of respondents indicated a preference for telemedicine versus an in-patient visit in the future. In light of these findings, telemedicine for spine care may be a preferable option for a subset of patients into the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19patient satisfactionspine surgerytelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33089712
PMCPMC9344498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.