Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089651›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2020

The Fifth International Survey of Critical Care Nursing Organizations: Implications for Policy.

Ged Williams, Paul Fulbrook, Ruth Kleinpell, Laura Alberto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of an educational programme on critical care nurses' competence at two tertiary hospitals in Malawi.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ged WilliamsChief Nursing Officer, Mafraq Hospital, United Arab Emirates and Adjunct Professor, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7481-2445
Paul FulbrookProfessor of Nursing, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Nursing Director, Nursing Research & Practice Development Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia and Honorary Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6547-1861
Ruth KleinpellAssistant Dean for Clinical Scholarship and Professor, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, TN and Professor, Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0142-7527
Laura AlbertoProfessor, School of Nursing, Universidad del Salvador, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-7961-9898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the activities, concerns, and expectations of critical care nurses and professional critical care nursing organizations worldwide.

designA descriptive survey methodology was used. This study is the fifth worldwide quadrennial review of its type to monitor variations in critical care nursing needs and provide robust evidence to inform policy related to critical care nursing practice.

methodsThe fifth World Federation of Critical Care Nurses international survey of critical care nursing organizations was emailed to potential participants from countries with critical care nursing organizations or known critical care nurse leaders. Data were collected online. Responses were entered into SPSS version 23 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and analyzed by geographical region and national wealth group.

findingsEighty-two national representative respondents participated in the survey, of whom two thirds (n = 56, 68%) had an established critical care nursing organization in their country. The five most important issues identified were working conditions, teamwork, staffing levels, the need for formal practice guidelines and competencies, and wages. The top five critical care nursing organization services that were considered to be of most importance were professional representation, as well as provision of workshops and education forums, national conferences, practice standards and guidelines, and local conferences. The most important contributions expected from the World Federation of Critical Care Nurses were standards for clinical practice and professional practice, international conferences, professional representation, and study and education grants.

conclusionsThe results highlight priority areas for critical care nursing and reinforce the need to address factors that can inform critical care nursing policy and practice. Results of this survey should be incorporated into strategic action plans at the national and international levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Nursing leaders, policymakers, and other interested stakeholders should consider these findings when planning critical care workforce requirements. Interested parties should work collaboratively to inform recommendations for further policy and action.

Indexed as

Critical Care NursingSocieties, NursingHealth PolicyHumansInternationalitySurveys and QuestionnairesCritical careeducationinternationalnursingprofessional issuessurveyworkforce

Identifiers

PMID33089651
PMCPMC7756856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.