Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089629›Full record

ArticleWorldviews on evidence-based nursing2020

Questionnaire to Evaluate the Competency in Evidence-Based Practice of Registered Nurses (EBP-COQ Prof©): Development and Psychometric Validation.

María Ruzafa-Martínez, Serafín Fernández-Salazar, César Leal-Costa, Antonio Jesús Ramos-Morcillo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07364994 (Effectiveness of a Team Based Learning Intervention on Evidence-Based Practice Competence Among Nursing Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07364994 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Team Based Learning Intervention on Evidence-Based Practice Competence Among Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled131ConditionsNursing Education in Evidence-Based Practice, Active Learning Methods and Life-skills Education, Evidence Based Nursing, Evidence Based Programs in SchoolsArmsEducational Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Knowledge in Motion: A Comprehensive Review of Evidence-Based Human Kinetics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María Ruzafa-MartínezNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6570-738X
Serafín Fernández-SalazarConsejería de Salud de la Junta de Andalucía, Úbeda, Andalucía, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4358-4793
César Leal-CostaNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7711-3877
Antonio Jesús Ramos-MorcilloNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-3326
Universidad de Murcia · ESJunta de Andalucía · ES

Funding

Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union 2018-1-ES01-KA203-050216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of valid and reliable instruments, based on current competency frameworks, is essential to respond to the need for accurate measurement of the competency of registered nurses in evidence-based practice (EBP).

aimsTo develop and validate a questionnaire capable of measuring EBP competencies in registered nurses following the competency framework developed by Melynk et al. (2014).

methodsThe study was developed in two stages: (a) creation of the questionnaire based on an operational definition of the construct, its face, and content validation by 10 experts, and cognitive piloting; (b) psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire by a cross-sectional, and multicenter study between February and November 2018. Analyses were conducted of the questionnaire's reliability and construct validity (exploratory [EFA] and confirmatory [CFA] factor analyses).

resultsFirst phase: The initial version of EBP-COQ© Prof contained 50 items grouped into four dimensions (attitudes, knowledge, skills, and utilization). After two expert validation rounds, a 35-item version was obtained with content validity index of 0.86. Second phase: The questionnaire was completed by 579 nurses; EFA with PROMAX rotation revealed that the four-factor model had the best fit (χ LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: EBP-COQ Prof© is a valid, reliable, and easily administered questionnaire that measures the self-perceived competency of registered nurses in EBP based on an updated and specific competency framework. It permits the independent evaluation of attitudes, knowledge, and skills related to EBP and of its utilization in hospital and primary care settings, allowing the monitoring of compliance with EBP.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNursesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairescompetencyevidence-based practiceinstrument developmentnursequestionnairevalidation

Identifiers

PMID33089629
PMCPMC7702117
OpenAlexW3094439286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.