ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Comparison of plant Cd accumulation from a Cd-contaminated soil amended with biochar produced from various feedstocks.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The bioavailability of cadmium (Cd) in agricultural soils is a significant health concern due to the potential risk of human exposure via foods grown in Cd-contaminated fields. Biochar has been known to have a highly porous structure and high pH, as well as containing various functional groups; as such, it can immobilize heavy metals. Although it has found that biochar amendment in Cd-contaminated agricultural soils could be effective in reducing Cd bioavailability in previous studies, differences in plant Cd accumulation from Cd-contaminated soils amended with biochars produced from various types of biomass have not been fully discussed yet; we aimed to address this shortcoming in the present work. The soil investigated was an acid soil (pH 5.1) and had an elevated concentration of Cd (total Cd: 3.3 mg kg-DW
Indexed as
Identifiers
33089459What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.