Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089448›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2021

Differential independent impact of the intraoperative use of navigation and angled endoscopes on the surgical outcome of endonasal endoscopy for pituitary tumors: a prospective study.

Ninad R Patil, Sivashanmugam Dhandapani, Sushant K Sahoo, Rajesh Chhabra, Apinderpreet Singh, Pinaki Dutta, Rama Walia, Roshan Verma, Rijuneeta Gupta, Ramandeep S Virk and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ninad R PatilDept. of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Sivashanmugam DhandapaniDept. of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India. ssdhandapani.neurosurg@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3497-4255
Sushant K SahooDept. of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Rajesh ChhabraDept. of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Apinderpreet SinghDept. of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Pinaki DuttaDept. of Endocrinology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Rama WaliaDept. of Endocrinology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Roshan VermaDept. of ENT, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Rijuneeta GuptaDept. of ENT, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Ramandeep S VirkDept. of ENT, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Chirag K AhujaDept. of Radiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Manju DhandapaniNINE, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Himanshi ChaudharyDept. of Pediatrics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Kiran JangraDept. of Neuroanesthesia, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Sunil K GuptaDept. of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite widespread popularity of navigation and angled endoscopes in endonasal endoscopy, there are hardly few studies on their efficacy with the extent of resection or retreatment. This is probably the first study to assess the independent impact of these adjuncts among pituitary tumors. Patients with pituitary tumors undergoing endonasal endoscopy were prospectively studied for their demographics, clinico-radiological features, intraoperative use of navigation, and angled endoscopes, in relation to gross total resection (GTR), near total resection (NTR), endocrine remission, and retreatment. Pertinent statistical analyses were performed. Among a total of 139 patients, navigation and angled endoscopes could be used in 54 and 48 patients, respectively, depending upon their availability rather than chosen as per the case. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics in relation to their use. The surgeon's perception of immediate benefit was noted among 51.9% while using navigation. The use of angled endoscopes towards the end of resection could help with additional tumor removal in 62.5% of patients. Overall, the use of navigation resulted in a significantly higher GTR (80.8% vs. 59.7%, OR 2.83, p = 0.01), a higher GTR/NTR (86.5% vs. 70.8%, OR 2.65, p = 0.04), and a lower retreatment rate (7.7% vs. 20.8%, OR 3.15, p = 0.05) than the others. In functioning tumors with cavernous sinus invasion, navigation had significantly increased remission rates (69.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.03). The use of angled endoscopes yielded a significantly higher GTR/NTR (91.7% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.04) and a lower retreatment rate (0% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.05) among only non-functioning adenomas. In multivariate analyses, the use of neuronavigation had a significant association with both GTR and retreatment rates (p values 0.005 and 0.02 respectively), independent of other confounding factors. The elective intraoperative use of navigation has a significant independent impact on the extent of resection and retreatment overall. While navigation results in better remission rates among functioning tumors with cavernous sinus invasion, angled endoscopy has a significant association with surgical outcomes in non-functioning tumors.

Indexed as

Pituitary NeoplasmsEndoscopesEndoscopyHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAngledEndonasal endoscopyGTRNavigationNTRPituitaryRemissionRetreatment

Identifiers

PMID33089448
OpenAlexW3094191903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.