Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089348›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2020

Physiological and quantitative CT-scan characterization of COVID-19 and typical ARDS: a matched cohort study.

Davide Chiumello, Mattia Busana, Silvia Coppola, Federica Romitti, Paolo Formenti, Matteo Bonifazi, Tommaso Pozzi, Maria Michela Palumbo, Massimo Cressoni, Peter Herrmann and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04885517 (Dynamic Transpulmonary Pressure in Covid-19 Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 134 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
27.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04885517 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Dynamic Transpulmonary Pressure in Covid-19 Pneumonia: Effects of Positive Pressure, Inspired Oxygen Fraction and Decubitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorSan Luigi Gonzaga HospitalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled72ConditionsCOVID-19 PneumoniaArmsEsophageal catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 285 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Observational

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Davide ChiumelloDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, ASST Santi e Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Mattia BusanaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, Göttingen, Germany.
Silvia CoppolaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, ASST Santi e Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Federica RomittiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, Göttingen, Germany.
Paolo FormentiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, ASST Santi e Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Matteo BonifaziDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, Göttingen, Germany.
Tommaso PozziDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, ASST Santi e Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Maria Michela PalumboDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, Göttingen, Germany.
Massimo CressoniDepartment of Radiology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Peter HerrmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, Göttingen, Germany.
Konrad MeissnerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, Göttingen, Germany.
Michael QuintelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, Göttingen, Germany.
Luigi CamporotaDepartment of Adult Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Health Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, London, UK.
John J MariniDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota and Regions Hospital, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Luciano GattinoniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, Göttingen, Germany. gattinoniluciano@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5380-2494
University of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Milan · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBRegions Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate whether COVID-19-ARDS differs from all-cause ARDS.

methodsThirty-two consecutive, mechanically ventilated COVID-19-ARDS patients were compared to two historical ARDS sub-populations 1:1 matched for PaO

resultsAnthropometric characteristics were similar in COVID-19-ARDS, PaO

conclusionsCOVID-19-ARDS is a subset of ARDS characterized overall by higher compliance and lung gas volume for a given PaO

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood Gas AnalysisCohort StudiesCOVID-19FemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsItalyLength of StayLung ComplianceMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPulmonary Gas ExchangeRespiratory Distress SyndromeARDSCOVID-19CT scanMechanical ventilationRespiratory system mechanics

Identifiers

PMID33089348
PMCPMC7577365
OpenAlexW3094251384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.