ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2021
The night out task and scoring application: an ill-structured, open-ended clinic-based test representing cognitive capacities used in everyday situations.
Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of diagnostic concordance between algorithms for Parkinson's disease dementia.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Short-term practice effects on measures of cognition and daily functioning in older adults.The Clinical neuropsychologist · 2026Article
- The Moderating Role of Online Awareness in the Association between Strategy Use and Performance Accuracy on a Test of Functional Cognition in Individuals with Acquired Brain Injury.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025Observational
- Incremental validity of the test of practical judgment (TOP-J) in the prediction of diagnosis in preclinical dementia.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2025Article
- Concurrent Validity of Performance-Based Measures of Daily Functioning with Cognitive Measures and Informant Reported Everyday Functioning.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025Article
- Functional cognitive performance augments cognitive screening data in older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Enhancing Ecological Validity: Virtual Reality Assessment of Executive Functioning in Children and Adolescents with ADHD.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Clinic-Based Measure of Everyday Planning Ability: The Overnight Trip Task.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024Article
- A Multidimensional, Person-Centered Framework for Functional Assessment in Dementia: Insights from the 'What', 'How', 'To Whom', and 'How Much' Questions.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe night out task (NOT) was developed as a naturalistic, open-ended, multitasking measure that requires individuals to complete eight subtasks comparable to those encountered during real-world functioning (e.g., pack travel bag, prepare tea). We examined psychometric properties and administration feasibility of this direct observation measure within a clinic-like setting using a tablet-based coding application.
methodA sample of 148 community-dwelling older adults (82% cognitively healthy; 18% mild cognitive impairment) and 57 younger adults completed the NOT along with other neurocognitive tests and questionnaires.
resultsInter-rater reliability across NOT primary (i.e., time, accuracy, efficiency) and process-related (e.g., error-types, self-corrections) variables was mostly excellent. NOT primary measures showed expected patterns of convergent and discriminant validity with measures of cognition, demographics, and well-being. External validity was established by the NOT ability to distinguish between age and diagnostic (cognitively healthy vs. mild cognitive impairment) groups. Demonstrating incremental validity, the NOT primary variables (execution time in particular) were predictive of self-reported functional abilities and completion quality of in-home everyday tasks over and earlier variables such as demographics, cognition, and mobility.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that the NOT and its app interface, which allows for continuous logging of observations, are a feasible in-clinic measure to assess cognitive capacities important for real-world functioning. With further validation, the NOT may allow for earlier detection of functional difficulties. Understanding errors and strategies used during NOT performance could also have implications for individualized interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.