Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089220›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2020

Protocol for an economic evaluation and budget impact assessment of a randomised, stepped-wedge controlled trial for practice change support to increase routine provision of antenatal care for maternal alcohol consumption.

Penny Reeves, Zoe Szewczyk, Melanie Kingsland, Emma Doherty, Elizabeth Elliott, Adrian Dunlop, Andrew Searles, John Wiggers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Penny ReevesHunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales 2305 Australia.
Zoe SzewczykHunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales 2305 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0036-1549
Melanie KingslandHunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales 2305 Australia.
Emma DohertyHunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales 2305 Australia.
Elizabeth ElliottFaculty of Medicine and Health and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales Australia.
Adrian DunlopDrug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales Australia.
Andrew SearlesHunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales 2305 Australia.
John WiggersHunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales 2305 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntenatal clinical practice guidelines recommend routine assessment of women's alcohol consumption during pregnancy. The delivery of advice and referral when necessary are also recommended. However, evidence suggests there are barriers to the uptake of best-care guidelines. Effective, cost-effective and affordable implementation strategies are needed to ensure the intended benefits of guidelines are realised through addressing identified barriers. This paper describes the protocol for evaluating the efficiency and affordability of a practice change intervention compared to the usual practice in an implementation trial.

methodsThe effectiveness of the intervention will be evaluated in a stepped-wedge randomised controlled implementation trial, conducted in an Australian setting. An economic evaluation will be conducted alongside the trial to assess intervention efficiency. A budget impact assessment will be conducted to assess affordability. The prospective trial-based economic evaluation will identify, measure and value key resource and outcome impacts arising from the multi-strategy practice change intervention compared with usual practice. The evaluation will comprise (i) cost-consequence analyses, where a scorecard approach will be used to show the costs and benefits given the multiple primary outcomes included in the trial, and (ii) cost-effectiveness analyses, where the primary outcome will be incremental cost per percent increase in participants reporting receipt of antenatal care for maternal alcohol consumption consistent with the guideline recommendations. Intervention affordability will be evaluated using budget impact assessment and will estimate the financial implications of adoption and diffusion of this implementation strategy from the perspective of relevant fundholders. Results will be extrapolated to estimate the cost and cost-effectiveness of rolling out the model of care. DISCUSSION: Uptake of clinical guidelines requires practice change support. It is hypothesized that the implementation strategy, if found to be effective, will also be cost-effective, affordable and scalable. This protocol describes the economic evaluation that will address these hypotheses.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000882325. Registered on 16 June 2017.

Indexed as

Antenatal careBudget impact assessmentCost-effectiveness analysisHealth economicsProtocol

Identifiers

PMID33089220
PMCPMC7566135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.