Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089198›Full record

ArticleClocks & sleep2020

Effectiveness of Visual vs. Acoustic Closed-Loop Stimulation on EEG Power Density during NREM Sleep in Humans.

Konstantin V Danilenko, Evgenii Kobelev, Sergei V Yarosh, Grigorii R Khazankin, Ivan V Brack, Polina V Miroshnikova, Lyubomir I Aftanas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clocks & sleep, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Konstantin V DanilenkoInstitute of Physiology and Basic Medicine, 630117 Novosibirsk, Russia; kobelev13@mail.ru (E.K.); yarosh@physiol.ru (S.V.Y.); khazankin@physiol.ru (G.R.K.); brack@physiol.ru (I.V.B.); pvmirosh@gmail.com (P.V.M.); liaftanas@gmail.com (L.I.A.).
Evgenii KobelevInstitute of Physiology and Basic Medicine, 630117 Novosibirsk, Russia; kobelev13@mail.ru (E.K.); yarosh@physiol.ru (S.V.Y.); khazankin@physiol.ru (G.R.K.); brack@physiol.ru (I.V.B.); pvmirosh@gmail.com (P.V.M.); liaftanas@gmail.com (L.I.A.).
Sergei V YaroshInstitute of Physiology and Basic Medicine, 630117 Novosibirsk, Russia; kobelev13@mail.ru (E.K.); yarosh@physiol.ru (S.V.Y.); khazankin@physiol.ru (G.R.K.); brack@physiol.ru (I.V.B.); pvmirosh@gmail.com (P.V.M.); liaftanas@gmail.com (L.I.A.).
Grigorii R KhazankinInstitute of Physiology and Basic Medicine, 630117 Novosibirsk, Russia; kobelev13@mail.ru (E.K.); yarosh@physiol.ru (S.V.Y.); khazankin@physiol.ru (G.R.K.); brack@physiol.ru (I.V.B.); pvmirosh@gmail.com (P.V.M.); liaftanas@gmail.com (L.I.A.).
Ivan V BrackInstitute of Physiology and Basic Medicine, 630117 Novosibirsk, Russia; kobelev13@mail.ru (E.K.); yarosh@physiol.ru (S.V.Y.); khazankin@physiol.ru (G.R.K.); brack@physiol.ru (I.V.B.); pvmirosh@gmail.com (P.V.M.); liaftanas@gmail.com (L.I.A.).
Polina V MiroshnikovaInstitute of Physiology and Basic Medicine, 630117 Novosibirsk, Russia; kobelev13@mail.ru (E.K.); yarosh@physiol.ru (S.V.Y.); khazankin@physiol.ru (G.R.K.); brack@physiol.ru (I.V.B.); pvmirosh@gmail.com (P.V.M.); liaftanas@gmail.com (L.I.A.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3804-2364
Lyubomir I AftanasInstitute of Physiology and Basic Medicine, 630117 Novosibirsk, Russia; kobelev13@mail.ru (E.K.); yarosh@physiol.ru (S.V.Y.); khazankin@physiol.ru (G.R.K.); brack@physiol.ru (I.V.B.); pvmirosh@gmail.com (P.V.M.); liaftanas@gmail.com (L.I.A.).
Institute of Physiology and Basic Medicine · RUNovosibirsk State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate whether visual stimuli have the same potency to increase electroencephalography (EEG) delta wave power density during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep as do auditory stimuli that may be practical in the treatment of some sleep disturbances. Nine healthy subjects underwent two polysomnography sessions-adaptation and experimental-with EEG electrodes positioned at Fz-Cz. Individually adjusted auditory (pink noise) and visual (light-emitting diode (LED) red light) paired 50-ms signals were automatically presented via headphones/eye mask during NREM sleep, shortly (0.75-0.90 s) after the EEG wave descended below a preset amplitude threshold (closed-loop in-phase stimulation). The alternately repeated 30-s epochs with stimuli of a given modality (light, sound, or light and sound simultaneously) were preceded and followed by 30-s epochs without stimulation. The number of artifact-free 1.5-min cycles taken in the analysis was such that the cycles with stimuli of different modalities were matched by number of stimuli presented. Acoustic stimuli caused an increase (

Indexed as

acoustic stimulationdelta wave power densityhealthy subjectsNREM sleepvisual stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33089198
PMCPMC7445827
OpenAlexW3021224594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.