Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33089195›Full record

ReviewClocks & sleep2020

Global Research Output on Sleep Research in Athletes from 1966 to 2019: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Michele Lastella, Aamir Raoof Memon, Grace E Vincent

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clocks & sleep, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Sleep and Performance in Professional Athletes.Current sleep medicine reports · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Running on Empty: Self-Reported Sleep/Wake Behaviour during Ultra-Marathon Events Exceeding 100 Miles.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2022
    Article
  18. The 100 Most-Cited and Influential Articles in Collegiate Athletics.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michele LastellaAppleton Institute of Behavioural Science, Central Queensland University, Adelaide 5034, South Australia, Australia; m.lastella@cqu.edu.au (M.L.); g.vincent@cqu.edu.au (G.E.V.).ORCID 0000-0003-1793-3811
Aamir Raoof MemonInstitute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah (SBA), Sindh, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-3203-418X
Grace E VincentAppleton Institute of Behavioural Science, Central Queensland University, Adelaide 5034, South Australia, Australia; m.lastella@cqu.edu.au (M.L.); g.vincent@cqu.edu.au (G.E.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-7036-7823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined sleep research in athletes published between 1966 and 2019, through a bibliometric analysis of research output in the Scopus database. Following a robust assessment of titles, the bibliometric indicators of productivity for studies included in the final analysis were: Distribution of publications and citations (excluding self-citations), top ten active journals, countries, institutions and authors, single- and multi-country collaboration, and 25 top-cited papers. Out of the 1015 papers, 313 were included in the final analysis. The majority of the papers were research articles (

Indexed as

athleticbibliometricsresearch outputscientific productionsleepsports

Identifiers

PMID33089195
PMCPMC7445811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.